He said he would uphold the Fed Law he was a state employee not Federal!
Posted on 10/29/2007 5:21:33 AM PDT by Reaganesque
I’d take boring over Clinton ‘excitement’ any day! Not that I’m a big Mitt fan - I’m not. A great manager must have a vision of what’s best for the organization, or rather the stockholders, the voters in our case. Clinton wants what would be best for Clinton. She’d throw her mother under the bus to be President.
And the bitch takes his used, soiled and then discarded women.
Who says she doesn't have family values?
The family that shares and plays together, stays together. {Up comes the breakfast}
We need a LIST!
“Lessons on Character” Hillary DOES need:
Life starts at conception.
Personal responsibility is undermined by socialism.
Marriage is between one man and one woman.
America’s strength is ENHANCED by a strong foreign policy backed by a strong military.
The military is no place for social engineering.
Previous socialist worked in a real environment of material shortages. Today, however, we live in a world of vast material surplus, such that even the poor can be as fat as a king. Thus the socialist now require human pathologies to remain in power as the “helper” to ‘poop’ in spirit.
So Clinton was actually working, and in DemThink, doing a good job, not as a poor model, but a good job as a model of what to do to be poor.
Mitt and the Republican party don’t get it.
They are reactionary in their approach.
This is to be expected as very few study socialism, it’s language, and themes.
Reagan new from coming from them, and fighting communist as head of the actors guild in the ‘40’s, a time of extreme penetration of the industry. Further Reagan had good fudemental training as a bradcaster and actor in the power of words and symbolism.
Mitt has no like education in this. He can play defense, but is untrained, and even though long lived in Massachusetts. In this case it might be said of Mitt that he has been well educated poorly. This is a typical fault of those who’s time and attention have been mainly economic and not political.
I just think he'll lose.
more coffee, less baseball
It’s taken as such an axiom by those WITH character (and not [situational] “ethics”) that what is on the inside is reflected by how you conduct yourself on the outside.
Yes, a president has to have character, or else you end up with the Communist Chinese making decades of weapons tech advancement over a period of 3 years and mysterious millions in campaign donations.
Agree.
This may be a typo for FReeper history. I'm series. I have to go take a shower.
I doubt Romney will get the nomination, unless all the other candidates implode, but he may manage to damage the eventual nominee enough to make Hillary's victory inevitable.
What happened to Reagan's "Eleventh Commandment"? Of course Reagan wouldn't pass Romney's test either.
Scary thought...the headlines next Halloween may be all about Hillary's inevitable victory four days later.
Huckleberry, it depends on the REASON they kept it together. And we all know the reason is PURE, POLITICAL ADVANTAGE/POWER! That counts for ZERO!
Baby killing, blood on his hands flip-flopping abortion rights anti-Reagan false conservative BUMP!!!!
Keep the fiath
He said he would uphold the Fed Law he was a state employee not Federal!
I will repeat:
“Baby killing, blood on his hands flip-flopping abortion rights anti-Reagan false conservative BUMP!!!!”
Based on this:
The Mitt Romney Deception (excerpt)
http://massresistance.org/docs/marriage/romney/record/
Romney supports abortion in general, and believes in sustaining Roe v. Wade.
“Romney ran against Senator Edward M. Kennedy in 1994. During a debate, Romney declared: ‘I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a US Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it.’ “
(NOTE: Romney has supported abortion since before the 1972 Roe v. Wade ruling!)
- Boston Globe, 3/2/2006
Video of Romney vs Kennedy 1994 debate.
“When [during their debate] Kennedy called him ‘multiple choice,’ Romney demanded an extra rebuttal. He revealed that a close relative died of an illegal abortion years ago and said, ‘Since that time, my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter, and you will not see my wavering on that.’ “
- Boston Globe, 3/2/2006
“On a questionnaire Planned Parenthood gave to the gubernatorial candidates in 2002, Romney answered ‘’yes” to the question, ‘Do you support the substance of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade?’ Romney also professed support for state funding of abortion services for low-income women, [Erin] Rowland [spokeswoman for the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts] said.”
- Boston Globe, 3/25/2005
“Marie Sturgis, legislative director of Massachusetts Citizens for Life, said she hasn’t detected any change in Romney’s stance. The group considers Romney to be an abortion-rights supporter, as do national antiabortion groups such as the Family Research Council.”
- Boston Globe, 3/25/2005
I doubt it, but perhaps that's just me. I think he makes a huge tactical mistake saying this and continuing to harp on this issue.
We have sunk so far in this country that, for many, the phrase “clean-livin’” is a pejorative.
Not just a pejorative but an impossibility as well. Apparently, anyone who claims to have a good family life is clearly a lying braggart in the eyes of some.
You're right Howie, she's already an expert at speaking out of both sides of her mouth.
Every candidate except for Mitt and Duncan hunter have a disgraceful family life either now or in their past!!!!! Sad that the Republicans are the worst.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.