• Send FReep Mail to Unmarked Package to get [ON] or [OFF] the Mitt Romney Ping List •
That headline is just begging for someone to shoot a gaping hole in his “clean livin’” brag.
Nowhere in the article did they give any evidence for this claim at the end: “Romney criticizes her, doing so.” (meaning that Romney criticized Hillary for keeping her marriage together).
In fact, Romney said the same think Huckabee did, that Bill Clinton debased the office and his marriage. Huckabee just said he doesn’t think that should be a factor in putting Hillary in the White house, while Romney clearly thinks having Bill back at the white house is a problem.
I can’t imagine Romney would ever fault Hillary for not divorcing Bill.
What I think is that no candidate is going to be perfectly aligned with any of our individual belief systems and all we can do is pick someone of high moral character. Shouldn’t be difficult, there are so few, and only one marriage is a clue, but not the end of the search by any means.
Here we go AGAIN....the Klinton machine is squirming once again under the weight of their own Mortal Sins and peccadilloes....
The water carriers will gladly follow them both into Hell...
Does America really want to go back to the dysfunctional Doormat?
Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops
We need a LIST!
“Lessons on Character” Hillary DOES need:
Life starts at conception.
Personal responsibility is undermined by socialism.
Marriage is between one man and one woman.
America’s strength is ENHANCED by a strong foreign policy backed by a strong military.
The military is no place for social engineering.
Previous socialist worked in a real environment of material shortages. Today, however, we live in a world of vast material surplus, such that even the poor can be as fat as a king. Thus the socialist now require human pathologies to remain in power as the “helper” to ‘poop’ in spirit.
So Clinton was actually working, and in DemThink, doing a good job, not as a poor model, but a good job as a model of what to do to be poor.
Mitt and the Republican party don’t get it.
They are reactionary in their approach.
This is to be expected as very few study socialism, it’s language, and themes.
Reagan new from coming from them, and fighting communist as head of the actors guild in the ‘40’s, a time of extreme penetration of the industry. Further Reagan had good fudemental training as a bradcaster and actor in the power of words and symbolism.
Mitt has no like education in this. He can play defense, but is untrained, and even though long lived in Massachusetts. In this case it might be said of Mitt that he has been well educated poorly. This is a typical fault of those who’s time and attention have been mainly economic and not political.
Huckleberry, it depends on the REASON they kept it together. And we all know the reason is PURE, POLITICAL ADVANTAGE/POWER! That counts for ZERO!
Baby killing, blood on his hands flip-flopping abortion rights anti-Reagan false conservative BUMP!!!!
I doubt it, but perhaps that's just me. I think he makes a huge tactical mistake saying this and continuing to harp on this issue.
We have sunk so far in this country that, for many, the phrase “clean-livin’” is a pejorative.
Every candidate except for Mitt and Duncan hunter have a disgraceful family life either now or in their past!!!!! Sad that the Republicans are the worst.
Mrs. Romney stole my line. : )
Exactly. People in high places must show good example!