Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

Well, one system you have a falling burning missile, one system you have a falling live missle and burning flares, and no system you either have a falling burning aircraft, or a burned out live missile that missed.

My vote is with the ones that think this is foolish on normal commercial airliners.

At almost every airport in this country you can get close enough to the end of the runways that nothing will be able to react quickly enough.

Think it’s just a feel-good waste of effort and money.


21 posted on 10/29/2007 3:42:51 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: RS

I tend to agree with your overall view on this. If they do feel they have to go ahead with some kind of system, I guess I’d rather see it go with a more tried and easier maintainable system of flares than the laser system. What the heck would happen if a plane is taking off and a small jet is landing at an adjacent runway and the thing mistakes the hot jet engines of the other plane as a missile and does something to that plane? Don’t tell me it couldn’t happen.


22 posted on 10/29/2007 3:57:06 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson