[editor-surveyor]

"Well, it just might have a bit more impact if it were from a different source."

Now that's a leftie whine if I ever heard one.

Socialist source = Good

Free source = Bad

[diogenes ghost]

"Now that'a a leftie whine if I ever heard one."

Oh BS.

Anytime an article from WaPo, NYT, LAT, etc is posted that has a liberal point of view it is immediately slammed as biased, inaccurate, planted, or anything else that will diminish it's impact; usually with good reason.

Conversely, many of the articles posted are from the opposite side of the spectrum, and very rarely receive any questions about their slanted view; again, usually with good reason.

But this article does not need to be read to understand it's slant.

A site with the address "clean-coal.info"....with a GW topic.

If the same article came from a research group, NASA, UN, a university, hell, from a myriad of sources, it might be newsworthy.

[E.G.C.]

BTTT