Posted on 10/29/2007 5:31:02 PM PDT by Graybeard58
WASHINGTON — If you’re feeling fat these days, blame Congress.
That’s just what the nation’s doctors are doing, saying that federal lawmakers are responsible for the fact that a salad costs so much more than a Big Mac.
Hoping to produce thinner waistlines, many doctors — including the American Medical Association — want Congress to stop subsidizing the production of foods that are high in fat and cholesterol and spend more to promote fruits, vegetables, legumes and grains that are not.
Farm Belt lawmakers are on the defensive.
“I agree that obesity and health are serious issues in America today,” said Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee. “However, blaming the cause on the crops that we grow in Kansas and/or the U.S. farm program is overlooking the personal responsibility we all have in our daily lives and diets.”
The debate is intensifying as the Senate prepares to vote on a new farm bill. On Thursday, the Senate Agriculture Committee approved a bill that would give a record $2 billion for specialty crops, which include fruits and vegetables, tree nuts, dried fruits and nursery crops. That’s at least four times as much as what Congress provided in 2002, when it approved the last farm bill.
The 2007 farm bill will determine which food industries get the most help from U.S. taxpayers over the next five years.
“The real scandal in Washington is the farm bill,” said Neal Barnard, president of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. “Senators take millions from corporations that produce bacon, burgers and other fatty foods. Then Congress buys up these unhealthy products and dumps them on our school lunch program. Companies get rich, and kids get fat.”
Fruit and vegetable growers, who have long felt ignored on Capitol Hill, are confident they’ll cash in this year. They want to persuade Congress to broaden subsidies beyond traditional farm crops such as corn, wheat, rice and cotton.
“Our markets are highly volatile, yet we have never relied on traditional farm programs to sustain our industry,” said Doug Krahmer, co-owner of Blue Horizon Farms in St. Paul, Ore., which grows blueberries, grass seed, hazelnuts, clover, wheat, flower seeds and flowers. Testifying at a recent congressional field hearing, Krahmer said he supports a future farm policy that will not only support American agriculture but also “will support and encourage the health and well-being of all Americans.”
Krahmer noted that on any given day 45 percent of children eat no fruit at all, while 20 percent eat less than one serving of vegetables. All U.S. children would benefit if Congress offered subsidies to lower the prices that consumers pay for fruits and vegetables, he said.
With the nation’s obesity rates rising dramatically in recent years, doctors are jumping into the debate with increased fervor.
According to the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, agribusiness political action committees have given more than $5 million over the past four election cycles to members of the Senate Agriculture Committee. And from 1995 to 2004, nearly three-quarters of farm bill agricultural subsidies for food — or more than $51 billion — went to producers of sugar, oil, meat, dairy, alcohol and feed crops used for cattle and other farm animals. The group said that in 2005 alone, Tyson Foods, the nation’s largest meat producer, received $46.6 million in USDA commodity contracts. Less than half of 1 percent subsidized fruit and vegetable production, according to the physicians.
Physicians are alarmed, saying the high-fat, high-cholesterol foods subsidized by the farm bill then find their way into the national school lunch program, contributing to obesity.
Members of Congress have been hearing a similar message from many different quarters this year.
In September, Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League, noted that since 1985, the actual price of fruits and vegetables has increased 40 percent, while the price of sugar and fats has declined by 14 percent. He said that “underserved communities cannot be denied access to the same healthy and affordable food that is available to more affluent Americans.”
As the Senate prepares to vote on the farm bill, the physicians committee has been running a television advertisement that seeks to link agribusiness and Congress.
Called “Dirty Little Secret,” the ad is a spoof of the legal troubles surrounding Idaho Republican Sen. Larry Craig, who pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct after an airport bathroom sex sting. In the ad, a well-dressed man in a bathroom stall taps his foot to signal his willingness to receive political contributions from the pork industry.
Childhood obesity and the adult diseases associated with it have reached “epidemic proportions,” Barnard said, noting government projections that children born in 2000 now have a one in three lifetime risk of developing diabetes. U.S. farm subsidies ensure that high-fat foods, such as corn syrup and corn oil, are cheap and widely available, while fruits, vegetables and healthier grains are not, he added.
All of the lobbying appears to be paying off.
“We decided that specialty crops needed to be a priority,” Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns told the United Fresh Produce Association last month, before he resigned. He told the group that the recently passed House of Representatives farm bill includes $365 million in aid to expand block grants to states for specialty crops. To pay for it, Johanns suggested eliminating subsidies for farmers who earn more than $200,000 per year.
Overall, the House's farm bill, approved in late July, would offer an estimated $1.7 billion for specialty crop programs. House Democrats say their farm bill would spend $400 million more for a fresh fruit and vegetable program for the school-lunch program.
It would expand a program that gives vouchers to low-income elderly people who are eligible for food stamps to buy fresh produce at roadside stands. And it would create a demonstration project to evaluate ways to address obesity among low-income groups.
AGRIBUSINESS CONTRIBUTIONS
Below are the total contributions made by agribusiness political action committees to members of the Senate Agriculture Committee in the four donation cycles from 2000 to 2006. Please note: These figures do not include campaign contributions from individuals.
Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., $805,359 Ben Nelson, D-Neb., $451,200 Richard Lugar, R-Ind., $418,542 Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., $393,024 Thad Cochran, R-Miss., $390,639 Norm Coleman, R-Minn., $389,366 Max Baucus, D-Mont., $328,058 Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, $322,526 Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, $321,533 Kent Conrad, D-N.D., $320,672 Pat Roberts, R-Kan., $319,034 Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., $267,865 John Thune, R-S.D., $215,650 Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, $193,903 Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., $181,365 Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., $171,746 Ken Salazar, D-Colo., $31,773 Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, $30,250 Amy Klobuchar , D-Minn., $21,800 Bob Casey, D-Pa., $21,000 Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., $0* Total: $5,595,305 Note: Leahy does not accept PAC contributions. However, he does accept other kinds of contributions from agricultural interests.
Source: Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Center for Responsive Politics
don’t forget that when govt subsidizes grain we’d expect more grain fed cows instead of grass fed. The cows grow bigger and faster that way so you end up with more beef and milk than normal.
No more Food Commercials on TV, please..
As soon as all the corn, wheat and potatoes are reserved for biofuel, we won’t need to be worried about being overweight.
We’ll have plenty of recycled cardboard non-caloric food to lose weight on.
I don't believe it. A Democrat advocating personal responsibility? Of course that big, fat Archer-Daniels Midland check has nothing to do with his newfound love of individual responsibility for big, fat asses.
NO, it’s the American public being convinced that ‘low fat’ was good for them, along with eat all those starches. It’s the food pyramid that did it and the ‘low fat’ nazis that continue to back it.
Sen. Pat Roberts, Republican-Kan.
Since the AMA & the USDA caused it, I should hope so ...
“The real scandal in Washington is the farm bill,” said Neal Barnard, president of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. “Senators take millions from corporations that produce bacon, burgers and other fatty foods. Then Congress buys up these unhealthy products and dumps them on our school lunch program. Companies get rich, and kids get fat.”
Good to see psychiatrist Neal Barnard and the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) have quit suing McDonalds and KFC and moved on to where the real money is: US Congress.
Fruit and vegetable growers, who have long felt ignored on Capitol Hill, are confident they’ll cash in this year.
Freudian slip? Or plain honesty?
They want to persuade Congress to broaden subsidies beyond traditional farm crops such as corn, wheat, rice and cotton.
And I thought corn, wheat, and rice were supposed to be good for us? Now they say they're causing obesity?
(Paging Dr. Atkins. Dr. Atkins, white courtesy phone ..)
According to the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, ... The group said that in 2005 alone, Tyson Foods, the nation’s largest meat producer, received $46.6 million in USDA commodity contracts. Less than half of 1 percent subsidized fruit and vegetable production, according to the physicians.
For every "physician" on the PCRM, there's 3 lawyers.
Any idiot can see where vegan Neal Barnard and the pro-PETA PCRM, would have a problem with "Tyson Foods, the nation’s largest meat producer, " ...
...U.S. farm subsidies ensure that high-fat foods, such as corn syrup and corn oil, are cheap and widely available,
Uh ... corn syrup is not a fat. And corn oil is a cooking fat. Neither are all that great for a kid's diet.
while fruits, vegetables and healthier grains are not, he added.
More fruits, certainly. Vegetables? mostly. Healthier grains ? nah.
Hey! Here's a radical idea ...
Let's stop subsidizing the production of food, high fat, low fat, all of it.
If it makes economic sense to grow it --the market will take care of it. No law required.
That way Mr, excuse me, Dr. Barnard and the PCRM can go back to suing your local movie house over coco butter in your popcorn ...
Yeah, it’s not like the government’s starch heavy food pyramid is to blame. Thanks Bubba.
>> federal lawmakers are responsible for the fact that a salad costs so much more than a Big Mac.<<
I think this is a big deal. Eating healthy is expensive and time-consuming, and usually requires more than 3 meals in a day. If you have a lifestyle that can accommodate preparation time, an extra meal, and extra money needed to eat healthfully, then good for you. If you have to stretch your food bill and have little time, then prepared meat and grains will make up most of your diet. It’s generally cheaper, and keeps you feeling full longer.
The sensible approach is to stop all government agricultural subsidies.
So of course congress will just increase them.
Whew...I thought I was in the twilight zone for a minute. Thanks for setting me straight.
Could it be that Americans are overeating because there is some nutritional requirement under-served by our typical diet, resulting in elevated levels of hunger and eventual weight gain?
I think fat police, should eliminate all the junk food in the movie theaters, and only have tofu dip and radishes, and on sundays celery sticks....
We all have our “comfort” food, something that we can relax and enjoy. With many lives spent making ends meet, most food we eat is done on the go, fast food.
Only when we can slow down our lives and enjoy all our meals, will we be food responsible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.