[gunnedah]

40% of these would turn their backs if it took more than two days to settle the conflict.

[G8 Diplomat]

The MSM, of course, won’t be mentioning this...

Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran
Bomb Iraaaan, and their president monkey maaan...

[Anti-Bubba182]

Bush may strike before the end of his term. Glenn Beck and
Charles Krauthammer have said they think he will.

[dan1123]

They will support the idea in theory, but anything more than an expensive missile leveling a few buildings and they will become anti-Iran-war.

[HerrBlucher]

Bomb Bomb Bomb BombBomb Iran

[Loyal Buckeye]

After reading the rest of the article, here is the money shot:

When asked which presidential candidate would be best equipped to deal with Iran – regardless of whether or not they expected the U.S. to attack Iran – 21% would most like to see New York U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton leading the country...

So, now we know the purpose of this "poll".

[popdonnelly]

Before we do anything, we should figure out what our goal should be, and whether it is achievable. Getting rid of the Mullah regime is quite different from bombing a few nuclear facilities.

[Man50D]

It’s only a matter of time.

[Brilliant]

52% are complete idiots.

[Mr. Mojo]

52% Support U.S. Military Strike Against Iran

Of the 48% who don't I suspect a good chunk of them (mistakenly) think that such an operation would necessarily involve an Iraq-style occupation of Iran.

[Radix]

Lets just do it and get it over with.

[aShepard]

.................A majority of likely voters – 52% – would support a U.S. military strike to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Yeah, but probably 80% of voters supported a strike in Iraq- that is before the first soldier bled from a boot created hangnail. Then it's Bush's fault, and impeach Cheney, screw Halliburton!

[Cobra64]

My obligatory post when the words "bomb" and "Iran" are used in the same sentence.

[cthemfly25]

The other 48% must be high on socialist toxins known to cause the brain to stop thinking.

[TruthShallSetYouFree]

21% would most like to see New York U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton leading the country

I would love to ask a follow-up question: What, exactly, has Hillary Clinton done in the past to make you believe that she would be the most effective American leader in dealing with Iran? (Or anything else, for that matter.)

[Rembrandt]

Zogby is a way left guy; only a liberal would trust what Zogby claims to be true. Proceed with caution!

[Senator Goldwater]

The War on Terror continues to THE central issue of 2008, which is why Hillary will lose.

[SaxxonWoods]

Thanks for posting, but I think this poll is not important whether accurate or not. This president doesn’t take or avoid military action based on polls.

[Kevmo]

We should just withdraw from Iraq & the problem will go away

.

.

.

.

.

points to tagline

[originalbuckeye]

Zogby should have acknowledged that if Hillary! is elected President, we simply won’t have a Military in this country. I can’t think of anyone who would stick around after their signed commitment if she were to become CIC.