I’m not opposed to homosexual civil unions. As far as I’m concerned this is a state-by-state issue to be decided by the legislatures.
My only beef is that the word “marriage” should not be applied/used in the legal language, thereby protecting religious institutions that do not recognize homosexual marriages from lawsuits claiming discrimination based on sexual orientation. As long as said religious institutions recognize the right of homosexuals to live unharrassed, if said homosexuals refrain from harrassing said religious institutions.
In other words, live and let live, and let God sort out the sinners later.
And bingo was his namo.
Civil Unions are just a scam to sneak same-sex "marriage" into the law. First, there's no difference between these unions and marriages, except in name. Second, once these unions are established, the left will say, "Hey, we've had civil unions for ten years now, and they're really the same thing as marriage, so why not just make it official and expand them all into marriages?"
Yep, just don’t use the force of the government to force me to pretend that a couple of turd burglars are a family.