Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble
Thanks, but I don't understand that as being the only defining condition (just defending my guesswork).

In a quick search I hit 21 'AIDS indicators' in addition to Kaposi's Sarcoma - which itself is not limited only to AIDS/HIV sufferers but appears to have been limited to certain ethnicities not associated with the Caribbean prior to the time frame you indicated.

Seems to me that the immune deficiency probably existed before the "new" cancer arrived to become its hallmark?

51 posted on 10/30/2007 9:07:05 AM PDT by norton (Go ahead, vote for Hunter, you know you want to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: norton
AIDS and related conditions are very distinctive to the trained eye.

David Livingstone, and successor generations of British colonial doctors, were superb observers. Their 130-year old drawings of various tropical maladies are still used for instruction and diagnosis - that's how good they were, and are.

If AIDS existed in Africa in the colonial period, it would have been well-known.

53 posted on 10/30/2007 9:14:38 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of trouble, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson