To: BurbankKarl
Neither the ranchers nor the farmers who rely on Klamath Falls water is mentioned in this article.
To: Zuben Elgenubi
Chris Tooker, zoology major, and one of Gray-out Davis’ flunkies.
To: Zuben Elgenubi
They have been pointedly trying to run those farmers and ranchers off the land since well before the 2001 crisis. They are coming at it from every angle possible and continue to show their abject intent IMHO.
THE STAND AT KLAMATH FALLS
How rural western farmers stood up to entrneched environmentalists and agencies of the Federal government and prevailed
7 posted on
10/29/2007 8:43:06 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Zuben Elgenubi
THAT is THE issue.
Envirofascist sleight of hand.
13 posted on
10/29/2007 8:52:40 PM PDT by
dadgum
To: Zuben Elgenubi
Exactly right!
...and they only power 77,000 homes with those dams, nothing much to worry about losing.
Sorry but the dam removal plan sounds idiotic to me.
These are the same assbites that will cheer every time alternative energy sources power one extra home, but they’ll gladly sign onto this plan.
These folks should be on medication for skitzophrenia.
16 posted on
10/29/2007 9:01:36 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(We yen to be numba one. We find Crintons to be vewy good people. Worth every penny.)
To: Zuben Elgenubi
Neither the ranchers nor the farmers who rely on Klamath Falls water is mentioned in this article. I noticed that.
30 posted on
10/29/2007 9:27:44 PM PDT by
c-b 1
(Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson