Even with their loses against Daniel Pipes and ACAIR, the Islamists still hope to destroy the opposition through the sheer quantity of their harassing suits.
How exactly does “Muslim Day” work? Are non-Muslims not allowed in? If so, what is required as proof?
Newsflash:
Constitution Flushed down the crapper in Texas.
What KIND of temporary order?
ex parte temporary orders are granted against inanimate objects.
The news media screws up the law again.
“What they object to, he said, is their allegation that the Muslim organizations, and therefore Six Flags, support terrorism.”
Not sure if they can prove any verbal or physical allegations were actually made...
If the mere presence of the group of “counter-protesters” were insinuating that there is a connection, that is only because the people (muslims and other patrons and staff of the event) observing made that conclusion, not the group counter-protesters...
Slander and defamation need tangible testimony or physical evidence to prove...Thats why video taping and recordings work so well in these cases...For example nooses hanging from a tree, inciting or vulgar speech levied against a person(s) because of some religious or racial slant, etc etc...
From a practical sense Six Flags probably had no intent to promote this to excuse a general connection between a faith and its connections to an intolerant islamofascism sect within that faith...
So for balance I would propose that Six Flags create a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Family Day to balance the sheet on this and see if the muslims come out to counter-protest that.../sarc
That would be a hoot! But figure those odds...
It won’t be long till Six Flags sponsors a Gay Day!
A TRO that says do not break the law?
Truth is an absolute defense in a defamation suit. Prove that these organizations do indeed support terrorism, and not only do you escape the defamation claim, you prove that supporters of this "tolerance" are enemies of freedom.
a temporary restraining order that prohibits him from harming, threatening or inciting violence against them.
Nobody is threatening or inciting violence against these filth. As to "harm," if it is harmful to expose them for what they are, then that harm accrues as a result of candor, and is not actionable. Indeed, it is a disservice to try to squelch that fact.