Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory

“would have been eligible for a hardship stay of deportation”
Good point. I did not know that part of the law.
(I am suspicious of any new bill in the House or Senate. What is in the fine print?)


22 posted on 10/30/2007 4:24:49 PM PDT by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: All
Learn English!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

24 posted on 10/30/2007 4:26:38 PM PDT by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

it has been a while but that has been around for decades.

Actually before 1996 it was actually only SIX years and the documentation requirements were far more lax. Since 1996 the requirements are much more stringent and your essentially can’t be subject of any felony cases where you were sentenced. Thus even if you do a “no contest” plea and do not have a TECHNICAL conviction, the USCIS will treat it the same as a conviction.


36 posted on 10/30/2007 7:30:15 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson