[kevkrom]

OK so we’re supposed to believe that “only” the LA Times is smart enough to dig up a story on a sex scandal and “everyone” knows about it? Fox, the Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, New York Post are all too stupid to sumble across it? Expecially now that “everybody” knows the Times is sitting on it? Sorry, sounds a bit fishy to me.

There's a difference between knowing about the rumors and having something to back them up with. I, for one, would hope that no one publishes stuff like this without a reliable source. In the case, perhaps it is only the LA Times who found a source and the delay is because they are unsure if the source is credible enough to "go" with.

[Non-Sequitur]

There's a difference between knowing about the rumors and having something to back them up with. I, for one, would hope that no one publishes stuff like this without a reliable source. In the case, perhaps it is only the LA Times who found a source and the delay is because they are unsure if the source is credible enough to "go" with.

D.C. leaks like a sieve. If there is anything like this happening on the campaign trail, then a lot more than one person knows about it.