Posted on 11/01/2007 6:08:28 AM PDT by johnny7
New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton - more than any other 2008 candidate for the White House - is seen through an intensely partisan lens by Californians, with about a third of the state's voters already having decided they wouldn't vote for her for president and another third decided they "definitely" would, a Field Poll released Thursday showed.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
The debate will not change the minds of any of the kool-aid drinkers, but it might shame them into not admitting they have a drinking problem.
Nothing new, its like any other election 1/3 for, 1/3 against, 1/3 in the middle to be won over. To insure a Hillary victory she needs to split the vote against her with a 3rd party candidate. If one enters, they’ll pull it off like they did in 92”.
Her negatives are worse than any Dem in memory... and Bloomberg or Paul as a third-party spoiler won’t give her the impetus she needs. Unless it’s a big-name conservative who goes that route... the third-party trick won’t work this time.
How any one can vote for this POS is beyond me.. How I ask you? How? She is the devil in a pantsuit and if you shaved her head the number of the beast would be there.. JMO
I’m in Southern California, and more than half the people I know think Hillary is the greatest thing ever born, and “Wouldn’t it be SO GREAT if she was President?!!!” It’s enough to make me hurl.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
She is hoping Paul and/or Bloomberg will rush to her rescue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.