Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Uncledave
2 posted on
11/01/2007 11:28:39 AM PDT by
SoldierMedic
(Rowan Walter, 23 Feb 2007 Ramadi)
To: SoldierMedic
Join the Navy and ride the waves. :-)
3 posted on
11/01/2007 11:30:12 AM PDT by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: SoldierMedic
Clark said the underwater buoy poses no threat to the environment. Well, that's a relief. Although the Dungeness Crab Commission begs to differ.
4 posted on
11/01/2007 11:30:42 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: SoldierMedic
"We've got a big chunk of iron laying at the bottom of the ocean which will probably gobble up a bunch of crab gear," he said. "It's just another place for things to collect and make a big mess." Well the ocean floor should always be nice and tidy right?
5 posted on
11/01/2007 11:34:12 AM PDT by
subterfuge
(HILLARY IS: She who must not be Dismayed)
To: SoldierMedic
Did you hear the one about the English guy, the Pope, and Raquel Welch in a lifeboat?
|
|
|
To: SoldierMedic
7 posted on
11/01/2007 11:35:39 AM PDT by
mikeus_maximus
(CAIR delende est.)
To: SoldierMedic
Man, I hate it when my buoy sinks!! Mankind has only been building them for how long? Was the buoy made in China? Too much lead?
9 posted on
11/01/2007 11:37:08 AM PDT by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: SoldierMedic
10 posted on
11/01/2007 11:38:15 AM PDT by
day10
(Rules cannot substitute for character.)
To: SoldierMedic
ummm - well, ahhh
Why would one expect that something plopped in the middle of the ocean in high wave territory would take on water'? No need to design it so's it wouldn't 'take on water'...what's 72 million, give or take a dollar...
11 posted on
11/01/2007 11:41:21 AM PDT by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
To: SoldierMedic
72-foot-tall??
That’s not an eye sore?
Build oil wells and extract oil from the coast of CA and Gulf of Mexico instead.
13 posted on
11/01/2007 11:47:17 AM PDT by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: SoldierMedic
16 posted on
11/01/2007 11:52:29 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: SoldierMedic
The company plans to recover the $2 million buoy next springAt that price, it might be worth a salvage effort. Wonder if it's still going to be there by spring?
17 posted on
11/01/2007 11:57:10 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: SoldierMedic
You could gather a lot of energy from ocean waves by floating huge weights over a large area in shallow waters. As a wave rolls by, the weight would ratchet up a pole. At its apex, the weight would remain in place. When the wave hits its trough, the weight would be released, driving a turbine... Then I thought, someone must have thought of this already. And
they have.
This seems to me like a very efficient, almost inexhaustible supply of energy. So why hasn't it happened yet? Too expensive, relatively?
20 posted on
11/01/2007 12:04:26 PM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: SoldierMedic
ROTFLMAO!
Reminds me of that baby seal(?) that was helped, released and then swallowed by a whale while the do gooders filmed it.
21 posted on
11/01/2007 12:05:49 PM PDT by
Badeye
('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
To: SoldierMedic
I'm sorry, but BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I just couldn't help it.
22 posted on
11/01/2007 12:14:59 PM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: SoldierMedic
24 posted on
11/01/2007 12:53:53 PM PDT by
M. Dodge Thomas
(Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
To: SoldierMedic
A number of years ago (pre global warming) I saw plans for a device which looked fairly promising and has since disappeared. The power unit consisted of a string of floats tethered offshore on one end and hinged together so they could flex as a wave passed lengthwise down the float. The flexing action alternately extended and retracted cylinders in each float which pumped water through a series of check valves. The floats seemed to be fairly simple and looked to be rugged enough to survive unattended service. The water was delivered to a low head turbine on shore which powered a generator, keeping all the electrical plant out of the water. As I said before, nothing ever came of this device, maybe it was ahead of it's time?
Regards,
GtG
26 posted on
11/01/2007 1:19:01 PM PDT by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: SoldierMedic
The company plans to recover the $2 million buoy next spring,
when the ocean calms
So, how much do they have to pay in fines to the EPA for messing
up the ocean floor?
And what about all the little ocean creatures that will be dispossessed
when the buoy is unceremoniously wrenched from it's place on the
ocean floor?
(/sarc...just found myself channeling the brainwaves of most
"ecologists" and "environmental-law legal specialists")
34 posted on
11/01/2007 2:34:09 PM PDT by
VOA
To: SoldierMedic
They need to find a jetty that creates a reliable riptide and engineer a housed water turbine to catch flow of the returning tide. That way you can work on land, don’t have to get barges to haul stuff out to sea, risk becoming a hazard to navigation, and lose your generator to storms and sinking.
To: SoldierMedic
The company plans to recover the $2 million buoy next spring, when the ocean calms...And they need a bouy to learn if there is energy in the ocean?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson