Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Vetoes Water Projects Bill
AP via SFGate ^ | 11/2/7 | JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 11/02/2007 10:34:40 AM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: SmithL

Veto everything. Last rodeo, etc.
Repeal the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty, too.


21 posted on 11/02/2007 1:01:46 PM PDT by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

Sounds like he is cutting off the EPA!

Woo Hoo!


22 posted on 11/02/2007 1:02:01 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Bump UCANN. Nice to SEE you!


23 posted on 11/02/2007 1:03:31 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Looks like our Texas Cowboy CIC has finally decided to put his spurs into the liberal democrats!


24 posted on 11/02/2007 1:07:29 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

He may have had his spurs, somewhere. But he hasn’t spoken to us this much before. Could be because the enemy is within; but we just don’t know.


25 posted on 11/02/2007 1:09:58 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

bttt


26 posted on 11/02/2007 3:11:40 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks; fieldmarshaldj; SunkenCiv; Congressman Billybob; kcvl

The reason for the veto seems rather obvious. The House approved a $14 billion waterworks bill, and the Senate approved a $15 billion companion bill. Rather than split the difference and approve a $14.5 billion bill, or even go with the Senate’s $15 billion, the conference committee reported out a $23 billion bill that proves that when pork multiplies, it’s because taxpayers are getting screwed.

Seriously — how did an extra $8 billion get added to the bill in conference?

That’s an increase of over 50% from the Senate bill, in conference. The larger embarrassment is that our elected representatives didn’t see this greedy manipulation of the conference process as any big deal and overwhelmingly supported the results.

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/015800.php


27 posted on 11/02/2007 5:46:00 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
The $23 billion water bill passed in both chambers of Congress by well more than the two-thirds majority needed to vacate a veto and make the bill law. Bush objected to the $9 billion in projects added during negotiations between the House and Senate.
Give 'em one they can override that isn't monstrously detrimental to national security, it's good politics. Well played, Mr. President.

And if perchance the bipartisan support falls apart, well, that's even better playing.
28 posted on 11/02/2007 10:50:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, October 22, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

Bush is now doing what Reagan never did, veto the pork.

Better late than never.


29 posted on 11/03/2007 6:26:53 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor
Bush is acting as a conservative. Let’s give him credit for these actions. He should have taken this stance a long time ago but better late than never.

Agreed. But the fact that there are enough Republican scumbags to help the rats override his veto is troubling, to say the least.

30 posted on 11/03/2007 6:32:58 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
The veto will be overridden in part because the GOP learned nothing from the earmarks thrashing it received in 2006. The party of small government still thinks the way to buy voters' favor is by bringing the bacon home.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

31 posted on 11/03/2007 6:36:54 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Correct!

To this link all of Clinton’s vetoes were after 1994.

http://www.rules.house.gov/archives/98-147.pdf


32 posted on 11/03/2007 6:47:45 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

Exactly, Rodm, billions on swamps!! To me, ‘restoring wetlands’ is irrelevant. They don’t want wetlands in the Netherlands — they have dammed the water off and made the wetlands into FARMLAND. How about that? Swamps are good for malaria and alligators. Isn’t this kind of like introducing wolves back into Yellowstone?


33 posted on 11/04/2007 12:48:51 PM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson