Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol
CNG is a better alternative to bio-fuels. Much of the infrastructure is already in place for the distribution of NG and relatively minor tax changes can rapidly expand that infrastructure.

If NG is a "better alternative" then it should be able to stand on it's own merits in the marketplace.

Why would you suggest government interference in the form of taxes, instead of capitalist market forces? Why would anybody want to use taxes to control any aspect of society?

Taxes are the problem, not the solution.

15 posted on 11/03/2007 12:48:55 PM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: been_lurking

Funny you should mention taxes because my thought was to actually REDUCE taxes on gasoline sold at stations that provide an NG pump. Say .05 off the gasoline tax to facilitate building the infrastructure.

This would achieve two goals ... first, a modest tax reduction on gasoline, and second, provide a market advantage (be it short lived) to those gas stations that take the risk and invest in the NG equipment.

If you reduce taxes the right way, it can be part of the solution.


29 posted on 11/04/2007 1:45:18 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson