Posted on 11/03/2007 3:06:30 PM PDT by Baladas
BRAVO!
ROFL
I don’t understand why any of you would rather have Hillary than Rudy.
Our non-support of Rudy doesn't equate to an endorsement of Hillary.
Ron Paul is not going to be President of anything.
Neither will Rudy. At least Paul isn't a pro-abortionist pig.
Same for Duncan Hunter, Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney.
Thompson & Romney, with Hunter as VP, are much more preferable than Rudy.
Do you not remember that we had 8 years of Clinton thanks to that knucklehead in Dallas.
Partly due to Bush I abandoning conservative principles.
ROFL
If Rudy is the nominee...you are not voting?
I'll vote but it won't be for Rudy nor all of the other GOP candidates.
HA!
Yep. All those “principled conservatives” who either don’t vote or vote for Ron Paul “to send a message” will give this country to the socialists.
There are certainly plenty of Republicans pushing for this too. Perhaps not for the same reason, so they can elect more Democrats to office, but, pushing for it nevertheless, to pay their globalist business buddies with cheap labor in exchange for campaign contributions for their loser campaigns. Those 20 million legalized illegals and their 40+ million relatives will be voting the same Republicans out of their cushy jobs, but the RINOs either haven't noticed or think they'll be so well compensated for a job well done, they won't need to be re-elected.
So very true. Ron Paul voters seriously need to reevaluate their priorities and those here their place in this forum.
ROFLOL!
Well who?
I don't prefer Hillary to Rudy. I don't want either one since one is as bad as the other IMO. Rudy, however, would be more damaging to conservative values in the long run since there would no longer be a Republican party to use as a vehicle for a conservative agenda.
Right now I’m supporting Paul but will support the GOP nominee if it’s Thompson or Romney (and they have to pick a conservative VP)
Actually, you could say, if Hillary wins, that Perot would be responsible for giving us the TWO most immoral presidents in our history. If Clinton #1 hadn’t won, we wouldn’t be talking about Hillary today.
Paul's not running as a 3rd party candidate. He has said so multiple times. The author of the article is feeding you a lie.
Remember 3rd Party gave us Clinton. Bush gave us 3rd Party. Giuliani = Bush = 3rd Party. No Giuliani no 3rd party.
That only Rudy can beat Clinton is an urban legend.
bttt
Giuliani will re-define it out of existence. He is the only one out there who can do that.
Giuliani will re-define it out of existence. He is the only one out there who can do that.
I’m not a Gulliani supporter but if you think he’s as bad as a Clinton you’ve lost your mind. Make no mistake about it, a vote for a third party candidate IS a vote for Hillary Clinton. And if you can live with that you’re just a sunshine conservatine anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.