Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Slippery Slope [$60 oil?]
Forbes ^ | 11/3/2007 | Daniel Fisher

Posted on 11/03/2007 3:54:36 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

Oil at $100 a barrel? No way, says one defiant expert. Expect $60 crude--soon.

War in Iraq, destabilization from Turkey, unquenchable thirst for energy in Asia, millions of fuel-slurping SUVs still cruising American highways. No wonder oil prices have jumped above $90 a barrel on the new York Mercantile Exchange, on their way to $100.

Not so fast. According to some longtime observers, we will soon see $60 oil. Their argument is that the main driver of price spikes is something hardly mentioned these days: a miscalculation by the world's most important supplier, Saudi Arabia. And within the next two months that miscalculation will be corrected and oil prices will drop. "It's sure getting set up for a hard fall," says George Littell, partner at Groppe, Long & Littell, a Houston firm that advises oil drillers and investors on the outlook for crude prices since 1955.

Here's how Littell sees it. Last year Saudi petrocrats thought demand would slacken at the same time that oil production rose from sources outside the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Nations. They cut back Saudi production from 9.5 million barrels a day in March 2006 to 8.5 million a year later in order to keep supply and demand balanced and crude prices hovering around $60 per barrel.

The Saudis got one part of the equation right. The International Energy (otcbb: IENI.OB) Agency puts world demand at 85.9 million barrels a day, up only slightly from 2006. And among the 30 industrialized nations that make up the Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development, demand has fallen by 100,000 barrels a day over that period.

But the Saudis overestimated non-opec production. While companies of many oil-producing nations are pumping cash into the declining oilfields of the North Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere, those projects haven't contributed as much crude as analysts expected. "If demand is less, what's got to be driving the price of oil is lower opec production," Littell concludes. "It's a miscalculation on their part."

Check out the relationship between prices and production in the accompanying chart. The Saudis hold the key to long-term oil prices since they are one of the few exporters--Kuwait and Abu Dhabi are the others--with the ability to increase production significantly. Littell says the Saudis realized their mistake and began pumping more oil in May. At the most recent opec meeting on Sept. 11 members agreed to boost production by another 500,000 barrels a day starting Nov. 1. That increase included a bump in the Saudi quota to 8.9 million barrels a day.

How long before we get some relief? It takes at least a week for the Saudis to complete the paperwork necessary to ship oil to new customers, including arranging letters of credit and other financial details. Then the oil rides in a ship across the Atlantic for 30 days. Add them together and Littell expects the impact of all that additional oil to hit U.S. markets in a couple of months or so. The Saudis "didn't plan on $80 oil," he says. "They wanted to keep it around $60 and did the wrong thing."

Not everyone buys this argument. Certainly not the speculators who've been kicking up the price of oil on the nymex for more than a year. Leo Drollas, chief economist at the Centre for Global Energy (otcbb: GEYI.OB) Studies in London, believes that oil prices will fall eventually, but not until the middle of next year. Refiners are still trying to refill inventories that dropped to the lowest levels since 2003 after an unexpected cold snap in North America at the beginning of this year. The increase in opec quotas, Drollas calls "too little, too late." Besides, he says, "We're facing a winter with low [inventories], and the market's woken up to this." The mess in Iraq, which ships 1.5 million barrels a day through the Persian Gulf, and brinksmanship by Iran may keep prices from falling quickly.

Either way, the theory that China's galloping economy will lead to $100 oil is bunk. Forty percent of that country's oil is burned in so-called stationary uses like electric plants, Littell says, which will be shifted to less expensive fuels if oil prices stay high. Most industrialized countries made that shift decades ago.

Cheap natural gas can also drag down the price of oil--albeit with a lag, since it takes a while to bring gas wells online or to convert some petroleum consumption to gas consumption. At the moment, a million Btu of fuel oil costs $15.40, versus $7 for gas. Two years ago that $8.40 spread was zero. Today's spread will narrow.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; gasprices; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2007 3:54:38 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Chart the cost of a barrel of oil against the dollar with the cost of the Euro against the dollar - oil hasn’t gone up, the dollar has been rapidly deflated by the Bush administration. In fact, the real price of oil, in hard currency, has gone down.


2 posted on 11/03/2007 3:59:35 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

hmmm,... could it be nearing time to Short the Oil Market???


3 posted on 11/03/2007 3:59:56 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

But.....but.....but....PEAK OIL!


4 posted on 11/03/2007 4:01:02 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

With India and China’s consumption I dont see this happening. Demand is increasing


5 posted on 11/03/2007 4:02:52 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Sounds like a dissembling dance to hide the fixing of supply to get the price higher then pump more at the inflated price.


6 posted on 11/03/2007 4:04:34 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Because they do not wish to be deceived, they cannot be convinced that they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Keep dreaming. We’ve reached “peak oil” and we are coming down the other side. The Saudi’s can’t produce anymore, Venezuala will soon be a net importer of oil because of a Chavez. The Brits will become net importers of oil this year. The Dems won’t allow any new drilling in the US and alternative fuels aren’t realistic. George Littell doesn’t know what he’s talking about and never has.


7 posted on 11/03/2007 4:08:58 PM PDT by baiamonte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
The only answer is to man up and drill , develop alternatives and of course get a great deal on Iragi oil. I dream of the day when all but the slow witted are off the sludge. Let them then destroy themselves.
8 posted on 11/03/2007 4:10:23 PM PDT by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

We live in a world that’s awash in oil.

$100 is simply a result of governemnt interference with free markets.


9 posted on 11/03/2007 4:21:16 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

There is an election next year. By October 1, 2007 the price of oil will be below $70 per barrel. My sympathies to whose of you who think that the free market determines the price of oil.


10 posted on 11/03/2007 4:23:44 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The only way we’re going to have $60 oil soon is if Iraq start to export substantial quantities of oil.


11 posted on 11/03/2007 4:25:11 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

we need a bumper sticker:

driving or flying
thank our military


12 posted on 11/03/2007 4:25:46 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

every false alarm starting with Katrina has jumped the price, and not once has it rolled back.


13 posted on 11/03/2007 4:26:35 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68 (CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Checking the entrails for portents reveals that speculators have overbid oil futures and if margins were eliminated oil would drop $10 right away.


14 posted on 11/03/2007 4:29:16 PM PDT by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

bump


15 posted on 11/03/2007 4:29:52 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Yes, but peak oil was last month. For those who wondered what peak oil would be like, this is what it is like.


16 posted on 11/03/2007 4:30:21 PM PDT by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: baiamonte

OPEC will be attempting to increase 1/2 million barrels a day after all. That will be a stretch but they probably can do it. Any more than that anytime soon is probably not reasonable. This is peak oil, and has been for a month and until somebody stumbles across an easy 20 billion barrel pool somewhere which hasn’t happened since 1967.


17 posted on 11/03/2007 4:32:57 PM PDT by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fantom

There is a knife-edge of balance between how much the oil oligopoly can can restrict the supply and delivery of oil, and the point where it become economically feasible to turn to alternatives. That is one of the reasons why tar sands and oil shale have not yet been extensively developed, or a wide adoption of processes like Fischer-Tropsch coal to liquid fuel which are only in developmental stages. There would have to be a ginormous infrastructure development for these alternatives to come to market, and the least slip in the price of oil could destroy years of investment.


18 posted on 11/03/2007 4:34:50 PM PDT by alloysteel (Ignorance is no handicap for some people in a debate. They just get more shrill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; styky

ping.


19 posted on 11/03/2007 4:35:26 PM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
There is a knife-edge of balance

Many appear to think that the instant we hit peak oil we will suddenly run out altogether. That won't happen, and this won't either.

20 posted on 11/03/2007 4:36:47 PM PDT by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson