Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kuksool; fieldmarshaldj

You’re correct. But Gilmore will be the nominee, and if elected, he would be good on the issues. I was opposed to his candiacy early on, but it’s clear that it’s pointless to oppose him.

Also, I don’t think that Mark Warner has really been tested on the campaign trail. A Senate race brings far more scrutiny than a state race, and he might not hold up well under it. I don’t think it’s hopeless.


4 posted on 11/04/2007 5:02:01 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued

Since General Pace isn’t running, then let Gilmore get the support he needs. Warner needs to have a few macaca moments to make the race competitive. I don’t think it will be a landslide for Warner. I think Warner should win by 7-9 points.


7 posted on 11/04/2007 5:07:50 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson