To: JCEccles
Fred had no coherent answer on abortion. He hemmed and hawed and hawed and hemmed. In the end he meekly said the killing could go on. He said he was personally against it but could understand and accept why some people (states) might be for it. This coming from a Slick Willard supporter??
23 posted on
11/04/2007 7:41:23 PM PST by
perfect_rovian_storm
(John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
Details details...
25 posted on
11/04/2007 7:46:36 PM PST by
ejonesie22
(Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
Another freeper peddling a Planned Parenthood anti-Romney advertisement with a forged signature.
The enemy of your enemy is still evil, if it’s Planned Parenthood. Anybody who quotes from attack ads of an abortion mill should have to go to stand in the corner and let the adults have a conversation.
To: perfect_rovian_storm
This coming from a Slick Willard supporter?? The chutzpah of the Mittheads is astounding, they really outdid themselves tonight.
35 posted on
11/04/2007 8:23:05 PM PST by
HerrBlucher
(He's the coolest thing around, gonna shut HRC down, gonna turn it on, wind it up, blow em out, FDT!)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
It’s a classic Clintonian tactic to attack other candidates on the exact issues where your own candidate is weak. It’s good chess-playing, but it’s intellectually dishonest.
36 posted on
11/04/2007 8:23:11 PM PST by
ellery
(I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson