Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VOA

? Don’t neutrons leave the architechture and expend the personnel?


18 posted on 11/05/2007 7:42:12 PM PST by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: txflake

“? Don’t neutrons leave the architechture and expend the personnel?”

Yes.
And (on the very long odds) if Israel used one, it would be a way
to send a message “Scientists of the world: don’t help rogue regimes”.

And I’ve got to eat crow if Wikipedia is correct.
Sounds like Reagan revived the neutron bomb program; all have now
been destroyed/moved from US inventory. I INCORRECTLY thought Carter
had stopped production and it wasn’t resumed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb
Development was subsequently cancelled by President Jimmy Carter
in 1978, but again restarted by President Ronald Reagan in 1981.[3]

Three types were built by the United States[4]. The W66 warhead
for the anti-ICBM Sprint missile system was produced and deployed
in the mid 70s and retired soon thereafter along with the missile system.
The W70 Mod 3 warhead was developed for the short-range, tactical Lance
missile, and the W79 Mod 0 was developed for artillery shells.
The latter two types were retired by President George Bush in 1992
due to the end of the Cold War.[5][6] The last W70 Mod 3 warhead was
dismantled in 1996[7], and the last remaining neutron bomb (W79 Mod 0)
was dismantled by 2003 when the dismantling of all W79 variants was
completed.[8].


19 posted on 11/05/2007 7:58:26 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: txflake

No, that is a popularly misunderstood myth. A neutron bomb produces a conventional fission explosion about the size of that used on Hiroshima from its primary. It is essentially a H-bomb with different casing and different ratios in the secondary. The secondary is designed to maximize neutron output that will kill in a ring around the primary explosion, leaving the infrastructure in that ring intact. It accomplishes this using super-cooled tritium gas instead of depleted uranium in the secondary “pencil.” This, and tritium’s 12-year half life, makes them considerably more expensive to maintain than your run-’o-the-mill H-bomb.

The advantage to this is that the x-rays and gamma-rays produced by the secondary are able to penetrate tank armor - even armor capable of surviving some of the blast itself. The same would apply to heavily-armored facilities as this one may have been. That is the real beauty of this weapon.

Hope that helps.


22 posted on 11/05/2007 10:13:43 PM PST by Lexinom (Your hopes and dreams rest on your right to life. GoHunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson