Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cajungirl
Frankly I think it plausible that you are correct. And IMO..that would be the logical thought. But, just because you know one woman "doc" from a "very, very rich" family...doesn't make it so.

The problem with the Clintons...is we know what they are capable of. It's like the person you know who is a liar and a cheat....and you don't trust them for nothing. They could tell you the sun comes up in the east...and you'd look at them cross-eyed.

FWIW-

113 posted on 11/07/2007 5:17:31 PM PST by Osage Orange (The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Osage Orange

Well, rich people abound in India, Pakistan and Saudi. Surely we can agree on that.

Besides, I am busy like a bee tracking down her relatives. And I think the political element is way more interesting and damning than any sexual fantasies of Freepers about Hillary. In fact, that sexualizing aspect of freepers/some freepers/ opinions is one that I think leads us astray and into bad repute.

I think Bill Clintons greatest sins were political and involved selling out our country. His dalliance with Monica was trivial beside those. But that is just me. Sexual scandal never seemed nearly as important as betraying your country.

Huma has deep ties to people who are political islamists I do believe.


114 posted on 11/07/2007 5:27:13 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson