Until now, the district has not regulated indoor burning of wood.But then the Nanny Staters realized their mistake and began writing new regs to control yet another aspect of our miserable little lives.
This is only the camel's nose under the tent. Their real objective is to completely outlaw wood burning.
The paper today said that enforcement will depend on neighbors turning in neighbors. First fine will be $50, rising quickly to $1,000 for subsequent violations!
To: ProtectOurFreedom
It’s San Franfreeko, IMO I hope they ban everything. Liberals deserve no less.
2 posted on
11/06/2007 10:15:58 PM PST by
chaos_5
(Fred & Hunter '08)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Denver has had this for decades. I’m not sure how much it reduces pollution, though. And the bay area doesn’t exactly get cold in the winter, so I wonder how many people use a fireplace anyway.
To: ProtectOurFreedom
We have enforcement of this in my town. The Air Board NAZI”S actually drive around whith heat guns detecting heat in chimeneys.
6 posted on
11/06/2007 10:29:20 PM PST by
umgud
(the profound is only so to those that it is)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
I have 10 cords of wood stacked on the basketball court. I watched Enter the Dragon on HD-DVD while sitting in front of a cozy fire. I don't miss California at all.
9 posted on
11/06/2007 10:43:13 PM PST by
Myrddin
To: ProtectOurFreedom
That the liberals stand for protecting civil liberties is a claim I place on par with Islam being the religion of peace. What a bunch of commie totalitarians.
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Their real objective is to completely outlaw wood burning.Correct. The sponsors of the NRDC want to sell more natural gas at higher prices. They don't give a crap about an overstocked forest.
12 posted on
11/06/2007 11:03:26 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
There were times in this country when wood and coal were the principle energy sources in the home. Such baked the bread, boiled the water and kept the family from freezing in the winter. The chief causes of death were influenza, diphtheria, and lung disease in the form of tuberculosis. Child birth was another leading cause. I am sure the air quality in the 18th century home was no better than the cave when early man used fire to keep warm. Man has inhaled wood smoke for eons. There has been little concern for lung disease from such smoke until we have allowed socialists with the desire to control people’s lives to exist.
To: ProtectOurFreedom
I am lighting an extra huge fire in the fireplace tonight ... I don’t care if I have to don shorts and run the AC to keep it comfortable in the house. Damn these nannystaters!
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Bizarre. I heat primarily with wood, and as a result offset the use of at least 700 gallons of heating oil. This season it’s going to be especially nice not to see the delivery truck in my driveway.
My stove runs 24/7 from November through March, and it only smokes if I put too much wood on a low fire, which is rare.
Wood. Good for America, good for your pocket.
20 posted on
11/07/2007 8:45:47 AM PST by
Jack of all Trades
(Connecticut deserves a Castle Doctrine.)
To: Red Badger
21 posted on
11/07/2007 8:46:08 AM PST by
Jack of all Trades
(Connecticut deserves a Castle Doctrine.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Under the proposed rule, people in the nine Bay Area counties who burn on bad air nights would be subject to a ticket and small fine."This isn't about tickets,. but having the public participate in a wood smoke reduction strategy to protect public health," said Karen Schkolnick, a spokeswoman for the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
It's great to see that the controllers are being consistent. I am just amazed that the word voluntary isn't used more throughout. That's the way these things always begin...
Think seat belts... second hand smoke...
Fortunately, cheating is out of the question. I can see a whistleblower hotlineline being well used after spotting the tell-tale smoke.
22 posted on
11/07/2007 10:26:41 AM PST by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
"This isn't about tickets, but having the public participate in a wood smoke reduction strategy to protect public health,"Yeh, OK, then as a punishment for the tickets they will have community service.
Right?
23 posted on
11/07/2007 10:28:34 AM PST by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
This is only the camel's nose under the tent. Their real objective is to completely outlaw wood burning.Here in the California Central Valley, it's been a fact more or less for at least 30 years. In my neighborhood, half the homes built as long ago as 1974 do not have fireplaces.
24 posted on
11/07/2007 10:29:06 AM PST by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Make them stop! All that smoke comes into the Central Valley and stays trapped in the natural inversion for the winter! Make the Bay people stop carbon polluting!
29 posted on
11/07/2007 4:32:37 PM PST by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
This has been going on here in Fresno,ca (central valley) for some time now.
Makes sense huh? Energy prices skyrocket, utility companies cry conserve, conserve, but dont dare burn wood for heat.
In another article, the forest service cant find enough loggers to cut and haul away trees out of the forest due to the enviro’s destroying that industry, and here now we cant burn the wood.
To: ProtectOurFreedom
BBQ’s are next...or have they already outlawed them too?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson