Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joshhiggins

If you read the article all the way through, you discover toward the bottom the acknowledgment by the sponsoring group that the group which did the study develops sex education materials for the schools and that some of the materials it “studied” were developed by the group itself. So, yes, I would say there’s a bias. What bothers me is why Fox would publish such a press report where it is clearly an unreliable result.


16 posted on 11/07/2007 6:13:09 AM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: caseinpoint
Fosk simply missed the part about "nonpartisan" "sex" ~ right.

The necessary implication is that there is "Republican" "sex", "Democrat" (ugh) "sex", etc.

Not a good source I'd say.

34 posted on 11/07/2007 4:35:43 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson