Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ari-freedom

IIRC Fred also supported the Partial Birth Abortion ban. So much for him not being pro-life eh?


76 posted on 11/07/2007 1:40:02 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight

I don’t think he is not pro-life. I just don’t see how he can unify the conservative base anymore. He muddied the waters with his statement and that gives a big advantage to Huck. Maybe just enough to split the vote so that rudy ends up winning

Well, we’ll see what happens at the next debate.


79 posted on 11/07/2007 1:48:44 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Some people can’t understand the concept of “it’s a state issue” and automatically jump you.


86 posted on 11/07/2007 2:04:11 PM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Actually I am glad you brought the partial birth abortion ban up. If Fred thinks that federal bans on abortion violate federalism why did he vote for the partial birth abortion ban. It seems funny that he would vote for a bill which is based on a very expansive view of the commerce clause and then cry “federalism” when given the opportunity to pass a constitutional amendment which by definition cannot violate teh 10th Amendment.


102 posted on 11/07/2007 2:43:21 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson