Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

KNOWLEDGEABLE observers see Clinton as being more than willing to support the use of US power against a terrorist state, provided, that is, she's the one ordering the use of force and not Bush. If she wins next November, that will be a reasonable position once she's sworn in as president in January 2009...If Hillary Clinton were to stop apologizing for winding up on the same side as Bush on Iran, and instead begin talking more about the cost that American failure on this issue would entail, it might not only strengthen her future position as president, but could also serve to rally international support for sanctions now while they still have some small chance of working.

Give up partisan political advantage for the sake of the country. Won't happen.

1 posted on 11/08/2007 3:28:31 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

There’s not much doubt that Hillary would love to be “A War President”. Get ready for rationing!!


2 posted on 11/08/2007 3:34:43 AM PST by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson