To: uncbob
>>Jail the pharmacist but not the woman<<
Did the woman take the pill knowing full well what it would do? The answer is in my question.
Keep in mind I consider this a state, and not federal, issue. That is the key problem with Roe vs Wade. The feds usurped state authority.
35 posted on
11/08/2007 12:33:02 PM PST by
RobRoy
(Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in 1938.)
To: RobRoy
Keep in mind I consider this a state, and not federal, issue. That is the key problem with Roe vs Wade. The feds usurped state authority.Exactly. I too believe this should be a states issue and not a federal one. After that, if I end up in a state that would allow abortions the next issue should be whether or not I would be helping to pay for them with my tax dollars. I say no. I should not have to pay for something like that.
For any state that would decide not to allow abortions there would have to be some way to enforce that. This is where there would be a hugh debate.
42 posted on
11/08/2007 12:40:34 PM PST by
truthluva
("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking" - JC Watts)
To: RobRoy
Did the woman take the pill knowing full well what it would do? The answer is in my question.
Did the woman or girl go to the abortionist knowing full well what was going to be done
Things don't occur in a vacuum
If an amendment was passed outlawing abortion it would be because the vast majority recognized abortion as taking human life and penalties would have to be part of the amendment etc
Therefore both parties would be guilty
As far as the age of the woman it would be no different than age considerations being taken into account for other crimes etc
To be logical that would have to be the position
65 posted on
11/08/2007 1:20:40 PM PST by
uncbob
(m first)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson