Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Single Nanotube Makes World's Smallest Radio
UC Berkeley News ^ | 31 October 2007 | Robert Sanders, Media Relations

Posted on 11/08/2007 1:10:44 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou

BERKELEY – Physicists at the University of California, Berkeley, have built the smallest radio yet - a single carbon nanotube one ten-thousandth the diameter of a human hair that requires only a battery and earphones to tune in to your favorite station.

The scientists successfully received their first FM broadcast last year - Derek & The Dominos' "Layla" and the Beach Boys' "Good Vibrations" transmitted from across the room. In homage to last year's 100th anniversary of the first voice and music radio transmission, they also transmitted and successfully tuned in to the first music piece broadcast in 1906, the "Largo" from George Frederic Handel's opera "Xerxes."

nanoradio video clip
Nanotube radio on video video
The nanotube radio seen under a high-resolution transmission electron microscope, which allows researchers to observe the radio in action as it tunes in Derek & The Dominos playing Eric Clapton's "Layla." When not tuned in, the nanotube does not vibrate. As the researchers tune it to the proper frequency, however, the nanotube vibates at radio frequencies, which blurs its image. The nanotube is about 700 nanometers long and 10 nanometers in diameter — one ten-thousandth the width of a human hair. (Zettl Research Group/LBNL & UC Berkeley)

Watch video (6.6Mb Quicktime file)

"We were just in ecstasy when this worked," said team leader Alex Zettl, UC Berkeley professor of physics. "It was fantastic."

The nanoradio, which is currently configured as a receiver but could also work as a transmitter, is 100 billion times smaller than the first commercial radios, and could be used in any number of applications - from cell phones to microscopic devices that sense the environment and relay information via radio signals, Zettl said. Because it is extremely energy efficient, it would integrate well with microelectronic circuits.

"The nanotube radio may lead to radical new applications, such as radio-controlled devices small enough to exist in a human's bloodstream," the authors wrote in a paper published online today (Wednesday, Oct. 31) by the journal Nano Letters. The paper will appear in the print edition of Nano Letters later in November.

Authors of the nanoradio paper are Zettl, graduate student Kenneth Jensen, and their colleagues in UC Berkeley's Center of Integrated Nanomechanical Systems (COINS) and in the Materials Sciences Division at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). COINS is a Nanoscale Science and Engineering Research Center supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Nanotubes are rolled-up sheets of interlocked carbon atoms that form a tube so strong that some scientists have suggested using a nanotube wire to tether satellites in a fixed position above Earth. The nanotubes also exhibit unusual electronic properties because of their size, which, for the nanotubes used in the radio receiver, are about 10 nanometers in diameter and several hundred nanometers long. A nanometer is one billionth of a meter; a human hair is about 50,000-100,000 nanometers in diameter.

In the nanoradio, a single carbon nanotube works as an all-in-one antenna, tuner, amplifier and demodulator for both AM and FM. These are separate components in a standard radio. A demodulator removes the AM or FM carrier frequency, which is in the kiloHertz and megaHertz range, respectively, to retrieve the lower frequency broadcast information.

The nanoradio detects radio signals in a radically new way - it vibrates thousands to millions of times per second in tune with the radio wave. This makes it a true nanoelectromechanical device, dubbed NEMS, that integrates the mechanical and electrical properties of nanoscale materials.

In a normal radio, ambient radio waves from different transmitting stations generate small currents at different frequencies in the antenna, while a tuner selects one of these frequencies to amplify. In the nanoradio, the nanotube, as the antenna, detects radio waves mechanically by vibrating at radio frequencies. The nanotube is placed in a vacuum and hooked to a battery, which covers its tip with negatively charged electrons, and the electric field of the radio wave pushes and pulls the tip thousands to millions of times per second.

While large objects, like a stiff wire or a wooden ruler pinned at one end, vibrate at low frequencies - between tens and hundreds of times per second - the tiny nanotubes vibrate at high frequencies ranging from kiloHertz (thousands of times per second) to hundreds of megaHertz (100 million times per second). Thus, a single nanotube naturally selects only one frequency.

Although it might seem that the vibrating nanotube yields a "one station" radio, the tension on the nanotube also influences its natural vibration frequency, just as the tension on a guitar string fine tunes its pitch. As a result, the physicists can tune in a desired frequency or station by "pulling" on the free tip of the nanotube with a positively charged electrode. This electrode also turns the nanotube into an amplifier. The voltage is high enough to pull electrons off the tip of the nanotube and, because the nanotube is simultaneously vibrating, the electron current from the tip is an amplified version of the incoming radio signal. This is similar to the field-emission amplification of old vacuum tube amplifiers used in early radios and televisions, Zettl said. The amplified output of this simple nanotube device is enough to drive a very sensitive earphone.

Finally, the field-emission and vibration together also demodulate the signal.

"I hate to sound like I'm selling a Ginsu knife - But wait, there's more! It also slices and dices! - but this one nanotube does everything; it performs all radio functions simultaneously and extremely efficiently," Zettl said. "It's ridiculously simple - that's the beauty of it."

Zettl's team assembles the nanoradios very simply, too. From nanotubes copiously produced in a carbon arc, they glue several to a fixed electrode. In a vacuum, they bring the electrode within a few microns of a second electrode, close enough for electrons to jump to it from the closest nanotube and create an electrical circuit. To achieve the desired length of the active nanotube, the team first runs a large current through the nanotube to the second electrode, which makes carbon atoms jump off the tip of the nanotube, trimming it down to size for operation within a particular frequency band. Connect a battery and earphones, and voila!

Reception by the initial radios is scratchy, which Zettl attributes in part to insufficient vacuum. In future nanoradios, a better vacuum can be obtained by insuring a cleaner environment, or perhaps by encasing the single nanotube inside a second, larger non-conducting nanotube, thereby retaining the nanoscale.

Zettl won't only be tuning in to oldies stations with his nanoradio. Because the radio static is actually the sound of atoms jumping on and off the tip of the nanotube, he hopes to use the nanoradio to sense the identity of atoms or even measure their masses, which is done today by cumbersome large mass spectrometers.

Coauthors with Jensen and Zettl are UC Berkeley post-doctoral fellow Jeff Weldon and physics graduate student Henry Garcia. The work was supported by NSF and the U.S. Department of Energy.

Further information:

More information and audio from Alex Zettl's lab

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory press release

National Science Foundation press release


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: nanotech; radio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Limitless possibilities for this technology.
1 posted on 11/08/2007 1:10:46 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Hmm, I wonder if there is potential for people like me - who have a hearing loss?
I hear little voices in my head...

2 posted on 11/08/2007 1:15:06 PM PST by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Derek & The Dominos' "Layla"

Really? I thought Clapton was on his own when he did that.

3 posted on 11/08/2007 1:15:14 PM PST by lesser_satan (READ MY LIPS: NO NEW RINOS | FRED THOMPSON/ DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Amazing how far we’ve come in 100 years


4 posted on 11/08/2007 1:19:30 PM PST by Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Hey, if it can receive Rush and be implanted into a liberal’s ear I can see all sorts of possibilities.


5 posted on 11/08/2007 1:20:23 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marvlus

What? What?


6 posted on 11/08/2007 1:25:49 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

So where’s the singularity, already?


7 posted on 11/08/2007 1:27:28 PM PST by Eepsy (The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Can they fit it inside a hollowed tooth?


8 posted on 11/08/2007 1:29:25 PM PST by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Derek & The Dominos playing Eric Clapton's "Layla."

Huh?

9 posted on 11/08/2007 1:30:04 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
Layla and Other Assorted Love Songs Derek & The Dominos [ORIGINAL RECORDING REMASTERED]
10 posted on 11/08/2007 1:30:07 PM PST by Enterprise (Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

“Mr. Watson. Come Here. I need you.”


11 posted on 11/08/2007 1:33:00 PM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Limitless possibilities for this technology.

Such as wireless power transmission, for example. An bucket of these, all "tuned" to a particular frequency, could potentially convert microwaves to power pretty efficiently. And I suppose you could also turn the process around, to create nanotube transmitters.

Which would lead to some pretty nifty wireless data transmission technology, too. Imagine having the nanotube receiver as part of the motherboard electronics.

12 posted on 11/08/2007 1:34:18 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

The Vibrating Nanotubes would be a great name for a rock band.


13 posted on 11/08/2007 1:37:29 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
Really? I thought Clapton was on his own when he did that.

No way: he also had Duane Allman to duel with on guitar. All kidding aside, this is a phenomenal achievement. Imagine a radio controlled device injected into your bloodstream that can monitor your metabolic functions and warn well in advance of pending problems. Or, it could work in concert with other such devices to deliver medication or target it to specific types of tissue. We are on the verge of some pretty amazing things here - and in the meantime, Democrats want to turn our health care system over to the government, which can't even deliver the friggin' mail efficiently...

14 posted on 11/08/2007 1:40:40 PM PST by andy58-in-nh (Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
"Authors of the nanoradio paper are Zettl, graduate student Kenneth Jensen, ..."

I have a question for Mr. Jensen. What's the frequency, Kenneth?

BWAHAHAHAHA!

15 posted on 11/08/2007 1:41:35 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
It will end up in the Dollar Tree in 10 years..

sw

16 posted on 11/08/2007 1:42:21 PM PST by spectre (spectre's wife (Zero Tolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

Thought you might like this.


17 posted on 11/08/2007 1:44:40 PM PST by HKMk23 (Nine out of ten orcs attacking Rohan were Saruman's Uruk-hai, not Sauron's! So, why invade Mordor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Layla is the title track on the Derek and the Dominos album Layla and Other Assorted Love Songs, released in December 1970.


18 posted on 11/08/2007 1:48:29 PM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ..

19 posted on 11/08/2007 1:51:54 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eepsy

There are other Singulatarians on FR?!?
Come and discuss at Mind-X.

http://www.kurzweilai.net/mindx/frame.html


20 posted on 11/08/2007 1:52:53 PM PST by Son Of The Godfather ("You're it!"... Get it?... It's a "tag" line. :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson