To: SergeiRachmaninov
Wow. I hate to sound like a lib but lethal force is not called for when “protecting your property”. Only in self defense or justifiably perceived threat of personal harm!
Almost everyone knows “you cant shoot someone unless they break into your house” and even that doesn’t hold up in court these days. If you are going to use your car to ram someone just to ‘stop them from getting away’, then you might have to expect to do some prison time if that person dies. I understand they MAY have been committing a crime.
4 posted on
11/09/2007 9:25:55 AM PST by
z3n
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: z3n
Yep, you sound like a lib.
To: z3n
You are right. You sound like a lib.
Sorry. ;)
124 posted on
11/09/2007 1:04:31 PM PST by
RobRoy
(Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in 1938.)
To: z3n
Theres a lot of difference between the various States in handling cases like this.
In Texas, this would be justified because you’re defending your lawful property and thus deadly force is allowed.
132 posted on
11/10/2007 12:31:10 PM PST by
BnBlFlag
(Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
To: z3n
Wow. I hate to sound like a lib but lethal force is not called for when “protecting your property”.
If you choose to steal, you should be prepared to die. I have no problem shooting someone stealing from me.
133 posted on
11/10/2007 12:39:22 PM PST by
jrg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson