Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: z3n

Several states have passed “Shoot the burglar” laws. If someone breaks into your house you can shoot them in the act whether or not they threaten you. In Florida, homeowners are exempt from civil liability.


7 posted on 11/09/2007 9:29:03 AM PST by CholeraJoe (Be unique. It makes it easier for the rest of us to identify the morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: CholeraJoe

In this case, the perps not only weren’t in his house, they weren’t even on his property.


15 posted on 11/09/2007 9:32:44 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CholeraJoe

These Burglar laws were passed long ago:

Exodus 22:2-3 (New American Standard Bible)

2”If the (A)thief is caught while breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there will be no bloodguiltiness on his account.

3”But if the sun has risen on him, there will be bloodguiltiness on his account. He shall surely make restitution; if he owns nothing, then he shall be (B)sold for his theft.


22 posted on 11/09/2007 9:37:48 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CholeraJoe
Several states have passed “Shoot the burglar” laws. If someone breaks into your house you can shoot them in the act whether or not they threaten you. In Florida, homeowners are exempt from civil liability.

that would not apply here as the persons were already off of the property... and were in the process of leaving ... Mr. Reid cannot claim any sort of feeling that he was being menaced or felt he was in danger.

39 posted on 11/09/2007 9:49:04 AM PST by SubGeniusX (The People have UNENUMERATED RIGHTS ... the Govt. does NOT have UNENUMERATED POWERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CholeraJoe

Exodus 22:2 (New International Version)
New International Version (NIV)

2 “If a thief is caught breaking in and is struck so that he dies, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed;


51 posted on 11/09/2007 10:00:47 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CholeraJoe

Even a state as leftist as NJ was toying with the idea of ‘shoot the criminal’outside your immediate home up to the edge of your property. That was over 10 years ago, and I’m not sure where that stands.

But to me, I’m going to err on the side of self defense if someone who breaks into my home. If they have the dementia or criminal disposition to break in, I assume they have no problem killing me if they see me first.


77 posted on 11/09/2007 10:41:42 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson