Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should voters have to prove citizenship?
Denver Post ^ | 10 nov 07

Posted on 11/10/2007 7:08:51 AM PST by rellimpank

El Paso County Clerk Bob Balink brings up an interesting point, but one that always raises political hackles.

If the state is going to require that people be U.S. citizens in order to vote, then it should allow election officials to verify that citizenship, Balink argues.

But if the state doesn't want to require a check of citizenship, then the law shouldn't even mention the word in its definition of eligibility. It would make sense, Balink says, to remove it.

But Balink doesn't want to remove the requirement. He just wants to be able to check for citizenship. Or else,he says, "How can I be sure I'm following the law?"

Balink, a Republican, insists, "It's not a political issue. It's a legal issue." But, of course, it's a political issue, too.

Republicans generally favor requiring potential voters to prove they are who they say they are. It discourages fraud, they say.

Democrats generally oppose identity or citizenship checks because it discourages people from voting. Voting should be comparatively easy, they say.

(Excerpt) Read more at denverpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: aliens; illegals; immigrantlist; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
--the fact that this question even has to be asked proves something---
1 posted on 11/10/2007 7:08:52 AM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Exactly. What is the point here? The fact that “somebody” wants to check, and “somebody” doesn’t should speak volumes.


2 posted on 11/10/2007 7:11:21 AM PST by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Should voters have to prove citizenship?

YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.YES.

3 posted on 11/10/2007 7:11:31 AM PST by GOPJ (If you talk to a well, you can't have nuclear weapons, period. - Freeper melancholy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Democrats generally oppose identity or citizenship checks because it discourages people from voting.

Democrats generally oppose checks on whether the voter is actually alive.

4 posted on 11/10/2007 7:12:02 AM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1923783/posts


5 posted on 11/10/2007 7:12:55 AM PST by GOPJ (If you talk to a well, you can't have nuclear weapons, period. - Freeper melancholy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
The REAL NEWS here is that someone writing editorials at the Denver Post has developed working brain parts: Frankly, it doesn't seem like a lot to ask to ensure that only citizens vote in U.S. elections.
6 posted on 11/10/2007 7:12:57 AM PST by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

The only thing I was NOT required to provide for my young children to play soccer was blood. I was required to give their SS#, birth certificate, proof of insurance and a photo ID. Oh and it needed to be notarized at that.

So when a person claims it is an infringement to require identification to show the right to vote then we are talking about VOTE FRAUD.


7 posted on 11/10/2007 7:14:19 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

-—maybe Al Knight was in the room—


8 posted on 11/10/2007 7:14:39 AM PST by rellimpank (--we need a special font for <b>SARCASM</b>--NRA benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

—good one—


9 posted on 11/10/2007 7:15:04 AM PST by rellimpank (--we need a special font for <b>SARCASM</b>--NRA benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

The Democratic Party strongly supports full Civil Rights for Necro-Americans!


10 posted on 11/10/2007 7:15:28 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Yes!


11 posted on 11/10/2007 7:18:02 AM PST by incredulous joe ("I promise if you don't stop that right now I'm going to threaten you again!" - Kofi Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
"Democrats generally oppose identity or citizenship checks because it discourages people illegals from voting."

There, fixed it.

12 posted on 11/10/2007 7:18:50 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

YES!!!


13 posted on 11/10/2007 7:20:27 AM PST by LadyPilgrim ((Jesus is real, He will never fail...I will serve him now, and throughout all eternity! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
“Democrats generally oppose checks on whether the voter is actually alive.”

Well, this goes all the way back as far as I remember.
Kennedy was elected by dead voters in Chicago.

The Democrats are the masters at voter fraud, as they are at everything crooked.
It is pervasive from the basic local election to national.
Democraps have never been known for having any class or civility.

14 posted on 11/10/2007 7:21:11 AM PST by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Should voters have to prove citizenship?

Yes. Next question.

I'd even go a step further. I think you should have to take a short current events quiz and pass it to be able to vote. I know there are people out there voting who can barely fog a mirror, yet their uninformed vote counts just the same as someone who makes the effort to be informed before they cast their vote. Yea, I know it will never happen, which is why I would make a great dictator but a horrible president. Still, it would be nice if...

15 posted on 11/10/2007 7:23:34 AM PST by econjack ("Wherever you go, there you are.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

My mother recently died. I hope she doesn’t vote Democrat next election.


16 posted on 11/10/2007 7:24:31 AM PST by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Yes. If people want to live under the leadership of officials elected by the citizens of some other country, they should move to that country.


17 posted on 11/10/2007 7:25:37 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

that’s good diversity ...a token person-with-brains...

Why, indeed, would someone not have to prove who they are to vote or participate in any other event where identification should be a requirement...

Try checking out a library book without a library card and ID...


18 posted on 11/10/2007 7:26:05 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

When I voted Tuesday, the clerk hollered “Hi, your husband was in this morning and your mother came in an hour ago”. Even so, I gave them my voter’s card and driver’s license and had to sign the list. If I hadn’t had a voter’s card, the only thing I would have had to have shown was a driver’s license and we all know how eager some states are to give those out like candy.


19 posted on 11/10/2007 7:26:08 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Democrats generally oppose identity or citizenship checks because it discourages people from voting. Of course. That is the idea, stupidos. Discourage non-qualified people from voting. You know, those illegal aliens, those folks using names off tombstones, those folks voting numberous times. You know, the democrat party's base.
20 posted on 11/10/2007 7:26:18 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20 (Obstructing a war is easy; fighting one isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson