Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PlainOleAmerican
There is no Ron Paul problem unless he ran as a third party candidate.

The other issue is the stupid or child minded third party voters/non-voters.
Some people are permanently ignorant and are doomed to repeat their mistakes over and over because they are THAT DUMB.

Look for the self righteous dumb voters to help Hillary by not voting Republican as some moronic version of a protest vote or non-vote.

These people are just plain stupid and don’t get that if you don’t get the Republican in, you get the fire breathing Hillary who will not give us conservative judges, less taxes and less social programs.

Some people are going to be dimwits again and I bet they will boast of their stupidity here on FR after they did it like they believe they were being heroes instead of the morons they really are.

28 posted on 11/11/2007 12:58:19 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy
Wrong...

You have it backwards. If he ran on a third party ticket, he would drain more anti-war votes from Democrats than from Republicans.

As it is, he is looking to hijack the RNC nomination using leftist money and leftist votes to over-ride the legitimate Republican primary vote. At worst, he could be nominated atop the RNC ticket by members of the DNC. (Not likely)

But at best, he can drain off votes from more conservative RNC candidates leaving Rudy atop the nomination. (possible)

No matter how you cut it, it’s dangerous to conservatives. What Republican would support such a thing?

42 posted on 11/11/2007 1:05:01 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: A CA Guy; Jim Robinson
Look for the self righteous dumb voters to help Hillary by not voting Republican as some moronic version of a protest vote or non-vote.

These people are just plain stupid and don’t get that if you don’t get the Republican in, you get the fire breathing Hillary who will not give us conservative judges, less taxes and less social programs.

Some people are going to be dimwits again and I bet they will boast of their stupidity here on FR after they did it like they believe they were being heroes instead of the morons they really are.

Here's the opinion of another "California Guy":

To: Jim Robinson

Nothing wrong with fighting for your candidate in the primary. But once the dust clears we have to support the anti-Hillary Republican candidate regardless of who he is. Hillary would be a loser for us all the way around.

159 posted on 11/07/2007 8:12:52 PM CST by gesully (gesully) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

To: gesully

Sorry, I will not be supporting a constitution trampling, gun grabbing, pro-abortion, pro-planned parenthood, pro-gay agenda, pro-thought crimes, pro sanctuary city liberal candidate for president. Best double and redouble your efforts to nominate a conservative instead of whining about Hillary.

160 posted on 11/07/2007 8:18:11 PM CST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)

133 posted on 11/11/2007 2:34:45 PM PST by Graybeard58 ( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson