Personally I’m not so sure the so called “front runners” are as electable as we’re supposed to believe. It’s pretty clear that voters on both sides of the aisle are unhappy with the same old crap.
In a way I think that’s part of what’s driving this Paul thing. He’s a little too different for me so I’m sticking with the right kind of different and going with Hunter. I just don’t see the democrats being able to defend against him.
They're really not, they're what the status quo has degenerated into.
Hillary is too establishment(for starters), Obama is a lightweight in all facets, Edwards is a snake-oil salesman.
Rudy is a democrat in republican clothing, Fred is... is... uh... I have no idea. But I'm disappointed in how Waxman ate him for lunch during the Chinagate investigation. Mitt is too malleable in my view. McCain, thank you for your service John, is unlikeable.
Hunter is solid as far as I can tell, on taxes, security, life, guns, and gets a high rating from small business which is paramount for me being that it's my livelihood.
More people should know about him!