Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reform Canada

Second chambers are difficult to get right, and from what I’ve heard the Canadian Senate is one of the more difficult.

A second chamber which works well is a very useful system indeed - the old-style House of Lords was excellent at that - but unfortunately where a chamber is unelected it is too easy for folk to run around wailing “democratic legitimacy”. Yet when the chamber is elected it becomes difficult to give it lesser powers than the other chamber.

Where there is no established heretidary basis for the second chamber, I have a fondness for indirect election (such as used to be practiced for the U.S. Senate).


5 posted on 11/14/2007 3:24:27 AM PST by FloreatIacobus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FloreatIacobus; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...

I would like to see a Senate that is elected but the senators for each province would be elected at the time of the Provincial general election. In the event of a vacancy, the by-election would be under Provincial control, not Federal control. That would make it regionally responsive as a counter balance to the rep-by-pop House which is heavily weighted in favour of Ontario and Quebec because of their large populations.


7 posted on 11/14/2007 5:43:20 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson