To: blam
This guy proves that cod have been able to adapt to past climate extremes but concludes, based on nothing, they may not be able to adapt to a warmer future, a conclusion at variance with his findings? Seems like proof that the “climate change consensus” is more of a religion than a science.
3 posted on
11/14/2007 3:02:41 PM PST by
colorado tanker
(I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
To: colorado tanker
"This guy proves that cod have been able to adapt to past climate extremes but concludes, based on nothing, they may not be able to adapt to a warmer future, a conclusion at variance with his findings? Seems like proof that the “climate change consensus” is more of a religion than a science."I thought the same thing when I read this:
"However this does not necessarily mean that cod will show the same resilience to the effects of future climatic changes due to global warming."
He covered both religions...Climate Change and Global Warming just to be safe.
5 posted on
11/14/2007 3:11:48 PM PST by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: colorado tanker
Seems like proof that the “climate change consensus” is more of a religion than a science. The AGW cult is going to start throwing virgins into volcanoes any day now.
6 posted on
11/14/2007 3:14:33 PM PST by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(A good marriage is like a casserole, only those responsible for it really know what goes into it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson