[metmom]

I’ve contended that scientists are wrong for ignoring an aspect of reality and I’ve been informed about how science does not deal with the supernatural, it’s out of the realm of science, it can’t deal with it, it only deals with the natural physical world that can be seen and measured, yada, yada, yada....

Now there’s bragging about how science has exposed the *truth* about what’s behind the supernatural and how great science is for doing it?

Here is a post addressing the issue:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1897820/posts?page=10#10

So which is it? Does it explore the supernatural or not?
How is it trolling pointing out inconsistencies in one’s statements?

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

So which is it? Does it explore the supernatural or not?

If you tell me my TV picture is generated by spirits living inside my TV, and I show you that no, there's an explanation for the picture that doesn't involve spirits, that doesn't mean I'm exploring the spirits that live in my TV.

The reason your question is called "trolling" is that you've mostly demonstrated yourself to be smarter than that. One obvious conclusion is that you just said it to be argumentative--that you must see that it's a silly thing to say but said it anyway.