To: Daffynition
The legislator who authored the "castle doctrine" bill says it was never intended to apply to a neighbor's property.
So as soon as someone leaves their home no one is allowed to defend it until they come home. God forbid the owner actually have a job and be gone for hours at a time on regular basis. Shooting robbers in the process of committing a crime sounds appropriate if not preferred IMO.
13 posted on
11/16/2007 5:12:55 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: kinoxi
As multiple posts show, in Texas you can use deadly force to defend someone else’s property. That law predated the “castle doctrine”, which addressed a different problem.
33 posted on
11/16/2007 5:30:44 PM PST by
achilles2000
(Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
To: kinoxi
In Mississippi the "Castle Doctrin" has this section
(g) When necessarily committed in attempting by lawful ways and means to apprehend any person for any felony committed;
I wonder if this mans action would be considered lawful?
43 posted on
11/16/2007 5:39:59 PM PST by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson