Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition
The legislator who authored the "castle doctrine" bill says it was never intended to apply to a neighbor's property.

So as soon as someone leaves their home no one is allowed to defend it until they come home. God forbid the owner actually have a job and be gone for hours at a time on regular basis. Shooting robbers in the process of committing a crime sounds appropriate if not preferred IMO.
13 posted on 11/16/2007 5:12:55 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kinoxi

As multiple posts show, in Texas you can use deadly force to defend someone else’s property. That law predated the “castle doctrine”, which addressed a different problem.


33 posted on 11/16/2007 5:30:44 PM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kinoxi
In Mississippi the "Castle Doctrin" has this section

(g) When necessarily committed in attempting by lawful ways and means to apprehend any person for any felony committed;

I wonder if this mans action would be considered lawful?

43 posted on 11/16/2007 5:39:59 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson