Hey, did you ever go to youtube and watch that video "I got a Crush on Fred?
This one...
Posted on 11/16/2007 8:06:00 PM PST by Josh Painter
Here’s the real reason the National Right to Life Committee didn’t endorse Mitt Romney...
They remember what he did to the last pro-life group that tried to endorse him, the last time he ran for public office.
Massachusetts Gubernatorial Debate
November 2, 2002
Watch the whole amazing thing, or for his comments on the endorsement issue in particular, click here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4
...and fast forward to 3:45 of the video.
You Mittwitts are all the same.
“Fred’s a loser.”
“Fred can’t win.”
“Mitt recently converted to pro-life therefore he’s geniune, Fred’s always voted pro-life therefore he’s a fraud.”
Massachusetts is a strange place :-)
To paraphrase Wellington: I don’t know what effect the Fredheads will have upon the Democrats, but by G-d they frighten me.
“This is absurd on so many levels. Foremost your laughable contradiction that the “media centers” drive “public opinion” into “believe one man, one woman...a hate crime” and yet somehow “70% of the population” supports “one man one woman as they do now”. “
You are not seriously arguing that after years of anti-family bias in the media, this nation has not gone down in our aprieciation and respect for the nuclear family. Twenty years ago, even Al Gore returned contributions from the gay community.
I am still waiting for a serious challenge to my correct analysis, people. True to vacuous phredonia form, the attacks are all about me.
Or this kind of inanity that if California permits gay marriage or fails to stop abortion, somehow the Bible Belt will continue to survive with the remnant of our parent’s moral heritage. That 70% is a remnant, one hundred years ago, it was 99%
You must be on dial up. It would explain the delay in your answers. Googling the on line thesaurus takes a bit, huh?
You make things about yourself, it is the first sign of ego and self esteem issues.
As far as you argument, it has been answered. If you want to go on flailing away with your opinion as if it were fact, have fun, I know we are enjoying it...
Bwahahaha, you’re an agitprop maroon. Slither back under your romneyrock. You didn’t know where Fred is from yet you have all this canned ammo to spittle out. You exposed your idiocy. Scurry away, stink bomber.
It's not just that Mitt didn't advance a pro-life agenda, he actively advanced a pro-abortion agenda with the provision in his much-touted socialized medicine program that requires abortion-on-demand for a mere $50 co-pay .
:) We can still think whatever we like.
He needs to start from the bottom of your list...
Cmon Papa, if we all used spell check there would never be any internet words like pwn3d, or FReeper words like hugh and series......and a lot of the fun of the net would go down in flaym3s....:)
Nice new tagline ya’ got there. :)
Thanks, but it ain’t new... about 2 months now......
FDT has turned it on (Leno show), wound it up (since Leno) and it looks like the Turbo has kicked in with the NRTL endorsement. Add some nitrous with an NRA endorsement and that will be all she wrote....yeeeehawwwww!
Ha haaaaaaa great vid!
Has Romney said that he wants abortionist prosecuted?
Doubt it, since he and his wife have donated money to Planned Parenthood in the past.
“Cautioning against a federal solution to the controversy over gay marriage, Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson on Friday applauded a Florida group for “taking care of business at home” by seeking a statewide ban on same-sex marriages.”
And what happens if two homosexuals get married in (say Mass. then move to (say) Miss? Are they still married? If Miss. say no, say goodbye to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution.
Fred wants a Federal Constitution admendment which will preserve the primacy of state laws in this area.
Now mind you, he won’t campaign for an admendment to define marriage as one man and one woman, even though the nation supports this. But he will campaign for the full faith and credit revision. The former has a chance of passage, the latter is not likely to inspire any passion for passage.
Frederalism - the last refuge for a lackluster campaign.
If a woman kills her unborn child, isn't she a murderer? If so, why do you want to let her go scot free......and please don't give me the liberal "she's a victim" argument.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.