Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Bush Blasts Senate's Judicial Review

Excerpt:

In a blistering rebuke, President Bush on Thursday said the Senate's confirmation review of his judicial nominees has too often become a "search and destroy" mission that ruins a person's reputation.

"Senate confirmation is part of the Constitution's system of checks and balances. But it was never intended to be a license to ruin the good name that a nominee has worked a lifetime to build," Bush said in excerpts of a speech he was to deliver Thursday night to The Federalist Society, a conservative group that emphasizes legal matters.

"Today, good men and women nominated to the federal bench are finding that inside the Beltway, too many interpret `advise and consent' to mean `search and destroy,' " Bush said.

Bush said the confirmation process does more than unfairly tarnish good people; it also dissuades qualified nominees from even being considered.

"Lawyers approached about being nominated will politely decline because of the ugliness, uncertainty and delay that now characterize the confirmation process," Bush said. "When people like this decline to be nominated, they miss out on a job. But America is deprived of something far more important: the service of a fair and impartial judge."

When asked to whom Bush was referring with his "search and destroy" line, White House press secretary Dana Perino said, "Just look to some of the confirmation hearings on Capitol Hill — and third party groups that help them."

Also speaking at The Federalist Society meeting, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas joined in the criticism of the confirmation process. His nomination was nearly derailed by a Democratic-controlled Senate in 1991.

*snip*

While urging separation of powers, Bush also used his speech to suggest how the Senate should do its work.

"The Senate is no longer asking the right question — whether a nominee is someone who will uphold our Constitution and laws," Bush said. "Instead, nominees are asked to guarantee specific outcomes of cases that might come before the court. If they refuse — as they should — they often find their nomination ends up in limbo instead of on the Senate floor."

15 posted on 11/17/2007 3:53:51 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: All

It’s news that involves Pres. Bush, but my fingers are curling as I type this one. @#%&*#

~~~~

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/11/bush_invites_gore_to_white_hou.html

It should be interesting inside the White House on Monday, Nov. 26, when the contestants in the close-as-can-be 2000 presidential election come face to face.

The White House announced today that President Bush will host and congratulate Nobel Prize winners from the U.S. on that date.

No doubt that Bush is looking forward to meeting Leonid Hurwicz, Eric S. Maskin and Roger B. Myerson, who won the 2007 prize for economics. Two of the three medicine prize winners are also U.S. citizens.

But an inconvenient truth is that most of the public’s attention will be paid to Al Gore, the former vice president who shared the Peace Prize with a group of scientists working under the auspices of the United Nations for research into global climate change.


17 posted on 11/17/2007 3:56:10 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson