Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOP_Lady
Me bad...I assumed they enacted this:

(G) Private clubs as defined in section 4301.01(B)(13) of the Revised Code, provided all of the following apply: the club has no employees; the club is organized as a not for profit entity; only members of the club are present in the club’s building; no persons under the age of eighteen are present in the club’s building; the club is located in a freestanding structure occupied solely by the club; smoke from the club does not migrate into an enclosed area where smoking is prohibited under the provisions of this chapter; and, if the club serves alcohol, it holds a valid D4 liquor permit.
20 posted on 11/18/2007 8:02:07 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

A judge in Columbus ruled that that part of the law was not clearly written and meant private clubs were illegal, so...


23 posted on 11/18/2007 8:03:48 PM PST by GOP_Lady (Death to the Nanny State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a

Nothing to apologize for, bud. :-)


31 posted on 11/18/2007 8:09:39 PM PST by GOP_Lady (Death to the Nanny State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a

Here’s the article about the private club exemption:

http://www.dispatch.com/dispatch/content/local_news/stories/2007/04/30/smoking.html


33 posted on 11/18/2007 8:12:57 PM PST by GOP_Lady (Death to the Nanny State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson