Posted on 11/18/2007 9:36:30 PM PST by Darvin Dowdy
here you go, little man. I gave you the links earlier. I’ll refer you to it again.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1927363/posts?page=44#44
Try this too. Although I don’t expect you to change your mind...
“Daniel Siederaski of the Jewish Telegraph Agency tried to get an interview with Paul, calling him repeatedly but not receiving any return calls. Wrote Siederaski November 9: “Ron Paul will take money from Nazis. But he won’t take telephone calls from Jews.” [Update] Finally on November 13 the Paul campaign responded. In a short interview JTA quotes Jim Perry, head of Jews for Paul describing his work on the Paul campaign along side a self-described white supremacist which Perry says he has reformed.”
Address the Stormfront ads.... address the KKK support... the best that Paul can do is to trot out someone in his campaign to make a puny, wimpy statement? But they’ll keep the money that keeps pouring in from these racist mongrels.
And you try to defend it... and not very well, I might add.
Does he or does he not receive money from White Supremacists?
Is he still receiving money from these same people?
Why does he not return that money?
Why does he encourage the support of these people, by keeping their money and support?
Rather than insult, little man, answer the questions.
That being said, no one in DC had a vote in J.D.'s election. If he didn't convince the folks in his own state, who he had represented for years, I doubt even if the folks in DC supported him, he'd have had a chance.
I do find your post amusing though. Ron Paul is receiving sizable support, relative to the size of his campaign, from Stormfronters and KKK members, as well as 9/11 Truthers and assorted other human debris. Racists, Jew-haters and kooks.
But those opposed to Paul are "obsessed haters". Yet Paul accepts the support of the real haters.
The Whitehouse didn't vote for his opponent, members of the 5th district in Arizona did. It's getting to where it's no longer amusing to read about how the GOP selects candidates and the poor voters don't have a choice. BS, the voters decide every election, both in the primaries and the general election.
If you are saying that you think Ron Paul could unite the Party, I would strongly disagree. Ron Paul is doing a lot of harm to the Republican party and to the conservative, consitutionalist cause generally, by making it appear that to be a consitutionalist you must first be a raving nutter bent on national suicide.
Need bigger government, more spending, larger deficits, leave the heavy jobs to the Republicans.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Neo-Nazi Leader Organizing Ron Paul Youtube “gaming”
According to the racist website, VNN forum, neo-Nazi leader Will Williams (aka “White Will”) is organizing another in a series of Ron Paul internet dirty tricks of the sort that have distorted cable news snap poll results
“I doubt even if the folks in DC supported him, he’d have had a chance.”
Well, we will never know.
"Get away from me boy, you're bothering me..."
Furthermore, I think it's funny and pathetic that you guys choose to ignore the large number (and growing exponentially) of regular, decent Americans who support Dr. Paul and instead try to paint the picture that his support is only from the far fringes... You would do well to work for the Clinton campaign, with the vicious way you attack those who threaten you, with distortions and smears.
Give it a rest, why don't you promote your own candidate instead of obsessing over someone who many of you keep saying has no chance to win.
Only Paul has a coalition of libertarians, swing, independent, and new voters supporting him, in addition to conservatives frustrated over Bush and the GOP.
All of the other GOP candidates are chasing after the same dwindling number of religious & pro-Bush conservatives. The election dynamics have changed, the old left-vs-right base isn't going to cut it. Huge number of folks out there disgusted with both parties and hungry for real change. I'm not saying Paul will win, but so far he's the only candidate who has tapped into this discontent, which may influence the general election.
October 27, 2007
Ron Paul Watch: Neo-Nazi Leader Don Black Donates to Ron Paul
words and pictures
Because their "candidate" doesn't have ordinary folks writing signs and spending their own time and their own money volunteering for said candidate's campaign. FReepers are hypocrites. For years, they whined about the "sheeple" not taking part in politics but along comes Paul and now they're complaining that they are taking part in politics, that they're "spammers" or "racists" or some other garbage. Oh the horror, people getting involved and thinking for themselves instead of being told who to vote for by the MSM and beltway types. It's all sour grapes, that's all.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Blow it out your ear pal.
The above photos remind me of the fresh faces at the Nuremberg rallys of the 1930s.
Gullible people being taken in by a person who has no form of reality.
I don’t disagree that Paul is influencing the election, and I don’t think we’ve seen the half of it yet. I think he can really upset the “establishment” applecart in New Hampshire.
I also don’t disagree that he is attraacting a lot of disaffected people, especially younger people who have been frustrated by both parties, but who can’t stomach the core beliefs of the socialists/Democrats. Even if they don’t buy into everything Paul is saying, he still gives them a comfortable home.
But I can’t imagine that Paul could manage to be the nominee or get elected. I think he is a longer shot than even Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo. I’m watching his contracts trading on Intrade, and at some point, I’m going to sell short into that market. I think it will be a lock-in profit generator. But I also think that he will go higher before he goes back down, so the time for a short trade is probably not right just yet.
Amen! And I would say the same thing to "Darvin Dowdy". The GOP primary voters aren't just ten or twenty "globalists" doing their darndest to make sure that sparkling personalities with compelling anti-illegal positions, like Hunter and Tancredo can't get their "message" out. I happen to trust the rank and file of the GOP to make the best choice based on a combination of ideals and electability.
Because promoting Rudy is hazardous to your FR account.
If only you could see how reminiscent that statement is of the statements made by supporters of a particular candidate who could be summed up as a bad haircut with ears. You probably don't even realize it, but that's almost word for word of the Perot voters mantra.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.