Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan eyes demographic time bomb
BBC ^ | 19 Nov 2007 | BBC

Posted on 11/18/2007 10:57:02 PM PST by BGHater

In the first of a series on Japan's population crisis, the BBC's Philippa Fogarty looks at what the demographic changes mean for Asia's economic giant.

A young girl visits Tokyo's Meiji Shrine

The number of children and young people in Japan is continuing to fall

In Tokyo's Harajuku district, a steady stream of people are visiting the Meiji Shrine.

Parents with small children dressed in traditional kimono stand in front of the shrine, clap twice and then bow, before turning to pose for a group photograph.

This is shichi-go-san, when families with children aged seven, five and three visit shrines to pray for their health and long life.

It is a happy and colourful scene. But the celebrations also highlight an issue looming ever larger for Japanese society.

Tourists and photographers outnumber the family groups, most of which include only one child. In the gardens around the shrine, grey is as common a hair colour as black.

'National viability'

Japan is about to experience demographic change on an unprecedented scale.

The birth rate has been falling steeply for half a century. In the early 1970s it passed the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman and in 2005 hit a record low of 1.26.

Population graphic

That same year, the population began to shrink. Forecasters say that, based on current trends, it will fall more than 20% by 2050.

But the Japanese, already famed for their longevity, are also living longer. In 2006, the average life expectancy was 82.

Japan has the world's highest proportion of elderly people. More than 20% of the population are now over the age of 65. By 2050, that figure is expected to rise to about 40%.

In graph format, it resembles a top-heavy skyscraper ready to fall.

Across Japan, people know that this demographic shift constitutes an enormous challenge.

It is an issue that "will not only have an impact on economic, industrial and social security issues, but ... is intertwined with the very existence and viability of Japan as a country", the Policy Council for Declining Fertility wrote in a report last year.

Rural signs

So what are the implications for Japan?

Firstly, a low number of babies now points to a shortage of workers in the future. In 2000, two-thirds of Japan's population were between the ages of 15 and 64. By 2050, that figure will be around the 50% mark.

A farmer works in a field in a country town in southern Japan
Country towns are feeling the impact of the population shift

That means that unless the government makes a U-turn on immigration or persuades more women and retirees back to work, companies will soon be struggling to fill jobs - bringing obvious economic implications.

Fewer workers also means fewer taxpayers and so less revenue for the government. But as the number of retirees goes up that same government will be facing increasing pension and healthcare costs.

How it meets these is an urgent question.

In the countryside, the effects of the demographic shift are already being felt. In many towns and villages, the proportion of old people is double the national average.

Young people are leaving for the cities and government funding is falling. Schools are closing, buses are running less often. In one rural town, an official said that if a new building went up, it was most likely an old people's home.

There are signs of change in the cities too. In northern Tokyo, the Sugamo shopping arcade has emerged as a playground for the elderly.

Pensioners shopping in Sugamo, Tokyo
Pensioners flock to their dedicated shopping zone in north Tokyo

There are no burger bars, CD shops or coffee chains. Instead, small shops and stalls sell clothes, traditional food and health products all designed to appeal to pensioners - a reminder of their increasing power as a demographic.

Parents, on the other hand, are not being similarly accommodated. In some suburbs, one young mother said, it was easier to buy clothes for the latest must-have accessory - a little dog - than for a small child.

Front-runner role

Of course, the demographic changes have not come out of the blue. The trends have been obvious for many years.

Successive administrations have taken steps to boost the birth rate and introduce financial reforms to meet rising costs. But the problems remain.

In 2006, Japan's birth rate went up slightly - children of the baby boomers are now in their mid 30s - but has since resumed its downward trend. And in October, a government panel recommended reviewing social security payments to the elderly to guard against a possible system collapse.

These problems are not unique to Japan. South Korea and Taiwan both have lower birth rates, while the average across OECD countries is 1.6.

Italy, Greece and Germany have all been hard hit, while several Eastern European countries are facing population decline.

Dr Kuniko Inoguchi, former minister for gender equality and social affairs, says that Japan has a front-runner role on the issue.

"We have a pioneering role to play in streamlining policies to combat the declining population. Japan has such a big population that if we could come up with a solution, I think that we could help many other Asian countries to come up with their solutions."

"So I hope the world will pay attention to it and that should help our government to put a higher priority on it."

Population graphic


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Japan
KEYWORDS: demographics; japan; population
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: ari-freedom
BTW, I wouldn't blame 'sexual liberation' for this. It has more to do with economics than 1970s style liberation movements. Same thing with the SINKs and DINKs (Single Income No Kids and Double Income No Kids) sprouting up all over the developed and fore-front developing worlds. As economies develop, more and more people start making choices between a certain standard of living and kids. For most people it leads to a trade-off between the two, whereby they have fewer kids (say replacement, i.e. 2 kids ....although true replacement statistically speaking is 2.1, but debating the statistical stem of 0.1 kids is not necessary here). In certain places, e.g. Japan and some parts of Europe, birth rates have even falled below replacement. In the US they are still slightly above, but a lot of the growth is due to immigration (France also has a similar trend, whereby for Europe their rates are relatively high, but it is mostly due to immigrants giving birth).

Anyways, it is more of an economic decision more than a 'sexual liberation' decision. Whcih is why some nations in Europe are either mulling over eliminating certain taxes for people who have kids, giving them benefits (e.g. educationa nd healthcare fo the kids), or in a few cases even proposing instilling taxes for those who don't have kids. This really has nothing much to do with birth control pills, or women working instead of staying at home.

21 posted on 11/19/2007 8:16:57 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

if there was no birth control or abortion they would have more kids. And if you are wealthier then having more kids is much more affordable...so it really depends on their values.


22 posted on 11/19/2007 8:22:19 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

When children are profitable, people have them. My impression of Japan is that it is expensive and people spend a lot of time at work. They don’t have the time or money to have children.


23 posted on 11/19/2007 8:29:21 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson