Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Page A1 of the Journal yesterday.
1 posted on 11/19/2007 10:08:55 PM PST by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: B-Chan

The suggestion that Saudis are content to sit on the flow of revenue at present (and thus have little incentive to invest in production expanding equipment and facilities) is a bit weak. In the short run there is little alternative to oil for personal transportation and a host of other uses. But as the price increases with demand, the Saudis would plausibly have an incentive to get revenues now (or in the next few decades) rather than chase them in a market say 20 years from now when what are now experimental technologies (e.g. hydrogen powered autos) are able to take a huge bite out of demand.


2 posted on 11/19/2007 10:20:46 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan
I liked this Nanosolar article posted a day ago. For less than $10,000, I could cover my Arizona roof with this stuff, and be generating over $6K worth of electricity per year. Unlike Al Gore, I don't use that much, so I could sell it back to the power company.

Technologies like this are going to make the oil sheikhs sorry they tried to sheikh us down.

3 posted on 11/19/2007 10:30:09 PM PST by AZLiberty (President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan

I wondered when a publication like the WSJ would publish that news.


6 posted on 11/19/2007 11:47:09 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan

Fording Coal.


7 posted on 11/20/2007 3:50:26 AM PST by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson