Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Life insurer balks on payout in killing of Clintons' neighbor
AP ^ | Nov. 20, 2007 | JIM FITZGERALD

Posted on 11/20/2007 6:10:03 PM PST by jdm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: jdm

A former criminal defense lawyer, Perez-Olivo was disbarred three months ago after a judicial panel ruled that he had “repeatedly refused to return unearned funds or retainers to clients.”

Court records say Perez-Olivo bilked clients out of tens of thousands of dollars.

The lawyer, who had practiced law since 1980, had previously been accused of incompetence for forgetting a crucial part of his closing argument in defense of Elio Cruz, a waiter convicted of second-degree murder for fatally shooting his wife’s lover last year in a Manhattan subway station.

“There is a lot of other things that, honestly, I thought of that can’t think of right now,” Perez-Olivo told the jury before his client was convicted and sentenced to 18 years to life in prison.

A juror was dismissed after she wrote the judge a letter complaining about Perez-Olivo’s “weak, shoddy” performance.

http://tinyurl.com/3e3m4n

******

Carlos Perez-Olivo was a lawyer with an intimate appreciation for the dark side of the law.

He specialized in criminal defense, standing up for more than 30 clients charged with murder. He represented the desperate and the violent: not only killers, but also drug dealers, fake doctors and illegal immigrants with minimal resources to pay for their defense.

Yet his understanding of the illicit was more than secondhand. In August, he was disbarred for misappropriating money from a client’s bail and other improprieties. In a damning passage from his disbarment order, a New York state court ruled his conduct had “adversely reflected on his fitness as a lawyer.”

The details might have been extracted from the very kind of murder cases that Mr. Perez-Olivo handled.

Three months ago, the Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court took away Mr. Perez-Olivo’s license. The decision was based on complaints from four clients who accused him of misconduct that included misappropriating bail money, failing to file appeals and charging excessive fees.

The decision noted that Mr. Perez-Olivo was admonished in 1998 for similar misconduct, and that in November 2000 he forfeited his license to practice law in Puerto Rico, at a time “when he was facing disciplinary charges based upon allegations similar to those raised here.”

http://tinyurl.com/ysxlwj


21 posted on 11/20/2007 8:00:12 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
I once saw a TV movie about some asshole that did this to his wife, in Boston I think.

If I remember right, the cops/courts were closing in on him, so he committed suicide by killing himself (jumped off a bridge, I think).

22 posted on 11/20/2007 8:44:52 PM PST by DocH (RINO-rudy for BRONX Dog Catcher 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmh47
//Insurance companies, You have to answer all of their questions if you want to get paid. If you refuse to answer, they can refuse to pay//

And the detectives have access to what the perp says/or not) to the insurance company.

23 posted on 11/20/2007 10:20:18 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: padre35
Yep

the guy may have co-operated with the insurance investigation..but not quite enough...the police may be trying to use the insurer as leverage to have the guy give 'just one more interview'

But as to observations on other cases, corporation’s will spend a million to avoid paying you a dollar, unless there is already a precedent there, and then the payout is generally established.

24 posted on 11/20/2007 10:29:04 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
"Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton, saying he ''has not been ruled out as a suspect.'' "

He he he, that caught my eye too...

25 posted on 11/20/2007 10:34:05 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

“her [Hillary’s] flying buttress”

Heh, heh!

Of course, flying buttresses are what reinforce the stained glass walls of Notre Dame Cathedral. But in this case, that’s priceless!

Hillary’s Flying Buttress - what’s really underneath that asbestos paintsuit.

You have indeed added to the English lexicon.

;^)


26 posted on 11/21/2007 2:55:19 AM PST by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Oops - I meant “pantsuit” not “paintsuit”.

But you know, there might be potential there, too.

;^)


27 posted on 11/21/2007 2:59:59 AM PST by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

“Two disbarred lawyers living in the same block.”

Well,assuming Mr.Perez-Olivo still lives on that street, he’s now the only one without an active license now. Clinton’s 5 year license suspension ended last January.


28 posted on 11/21/2007 3:32:10 AM PST by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

Justice cares.


29 posted on 11/21/2007 5:38:33 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jdm

The alibi is surely the bad karma that has moved in. Clinton Inc.


30 posted on 11/21/2007 5:40:49 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
Justice cares.

Oh. Well I'm not justice, I'm jaysun. I say string him up!
31 posted on 11/21/2007 7:05:32 AM PST by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rmh47
Interesting. There is no fifth amendment protection against self incrimination as far as insurance companies are concerned.

There is. They have a right to ask and you have a right not to anwer them.

They have the right to ask you anything they want about events surrounding your claim. You have to answer all of their questions if you want to get paid. If you refuse to answer, they can refuse to pay.

Yep. That is part of the business contract you freely agree to in exchange for the insurance company agreeing to be at financial risk for legitimate claims. Anybody that does not like the terms of the contract can simply decline to enter into it.

32 posted on 11/21/2007 7:15:54 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

Dayummmmm. More members for the Clinton body count club. They obviously knew something.


33 posted on 11/21/2007 9:51:08 AM PST by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson