[CindyDawg]

I am both also but sometimes you just have to say no to the best deal offered, be it a social or economic issue.

[Hunterite]

See:

“In the Cato Institute’s biannual ranking of governors on fiscal issues, Romney received a grade of only “C.” ....”

The Cato Institute is an open-borders/free-trade Libertarian organization, FOX NEWS carefully didn’t bring up those two favorite libertarian subjects. Instead FOX NEWS just spouts out grades the candidates get as if this were gospel economic conservatism.

FOX NEWS is an open-borders/free-trade zone. I got nothing against Libertarians, other then the fact that they WILL sacrifice their principles, I will not sacrifice mine.

[Greg F]

I feel the same way. I won’t sit on my hands because of one issue. But you know many will on the abortion issue.

[going hot]

Saying no to both is no doubt a choice you have regards who to vote for.

However, I submit, it is not a choice that is available to make regards the next president.

In reality, the "choice" you are given is not whom you would like or dislike as a US President, but more frankly, of the two from whom one is most assuredly going to be the next president, which do you wish to support?

[3niner]

Hillary thanks you.