Then they run the risk of openly Socialist libs winning the White House. That’ll protect your savings/investments/property, not.
It isn’t lesser of two evils. It is the better of two lessers. Hoping that electioning the Left will result in a backlash is hoping for a day that may never come.
Meanwhile the Left will oppose the Republicans regardless of the policy initiatives or any concessions they make. The GOP base will also oppose Republicans on principle when they are ticked off.
A do nothing Republican is better than a runaway lib.
Morning Weegee,
I agree with you one hundred percent. It will probably be a choice of the lesser of the two evils.
I oppose Rudy on his pro-gay, pro-abortion and illegal immigration concepts.
However we cannot allow for “Commie-Marxist” Shrillary to occupy the oval office. We do not need another Pee Wee Herman (Ross Perot) third party to cost us an election as in 1992.
The so called economic conservatives best get off their duffs and vote for the republican nominee.
America does not need (Arkansas Trailer Park Trash) back in the Whitehouse.
Shrillary would cause a civil war in this country with her Alinsky mindset(communistic-marxist) doctrine affecting the (Good Men&Women) of America.
America deserves better and we together will put another Republican(Whomever) back in the Whitehouse in 2008.
“Better to vote Repub than to stay at home and soon become a Red.”
Respectfully,
NSNR