Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Candor7
THe kicker is that even expert miliary riflemen ( which Oswald was not) could not fire the shots in rapid succession with accuracy required, with the firearm used by Oswald.

I distinctly remember watching a TV Special ( CBS w/ Walter Cronkite, IIRC) where they duplicated the shots.

They had a similar rifle, elevated to the same height, moving target, the whole enchilada.

It could and was done.

And seeing the 'missing' frames of the Zapruder film, there is absolutely no question that the wound on Kennedy's right front head was an exit wound.
That shot didn't come from the side or front. It came from the rear.

27 posted on 11/21/2007 6:45:56 PM PST by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Vinnie
One shot came from the rear. There were 3 in quick succession . yes? Maybe 4. No way Oswald could have gotten them all off with his level of expertise. I do not believe he actually fired a shot.His subsequent behavior is not consistent with being a shooter either.

Many want desperately to put exactitude on an event that will never have it. You are right about that shot coming from the rear. But we cannot say that Oswald pulled the trigger, because others were involved. At best, we will never know. I happen to believe Oswald was a carefully set screen, given all of the facts as well as the shooting forensics.

63 posted on 11/21/2007 8:29:23 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson