Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eye of Unk; All

There was also talk of upgrading the engines to get greater than 1:1 thrust to weight ratio to allow vertical climbs. Don’t know where that went. Anybody?


10 posted on 11/21/2007 4:59:39 PM PST by 50mm (Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist - G. Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: 50mm

I understand they still suffer birdstrikes from the rear.

I am unsure if an upgrade was included in this upgrade.


11 posted on 11/21/2007 5:02:30 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: 50mm

Well, they could be, but the A-10 design has always called for converted airliner engines to power it.

It made for a hell of a cheap and reliable ground attack plane.


12 posted on 11/21/2007 5:10:22 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: 50mm

Center of gravity issues. The new engines are heavier and there is no place forward of the COG to put ballast. Their working on trimming the engine weight but the ideas I’ve read would mean the engines would then cost as much as the original aircraft.


47 posted on 11/21/2007 7:57:09 PM PST by Mamba56 ("You've got to kill people, and when you've killed enough they stop fighting." - Gen. Curtis LeMay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson