Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1rudeboy

“Marx claimed he was in favor of free trade because it would antagonize the working classes into overthrowing the bourgeoise. How do you reconcile the above with a comment such as claiming free trade is destroying the middle class, or other such garbage?”

**********

Marx was in favor of free-trade because he was personally profiting from free-trade.


61 posted on 11/22/2007 8:42:41 AM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Hunterite

So all his class-warfare rhetoric was a sham? What about yours?


62 posted on 11/22/2007 8:43:50 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama; LowCountryJoe
I'm pinging some people who actually know their economic history: did Marx personally profit from free trade? What definition of free trade are we using now, if that's the case?

Seriously, I've never heard that angle before . . . and I thought I've heard them all.

65 posted on 11/22/2007 8:47:53 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Hunterite

That Marx, et all, are/were hypocrites is well known. He didn’t enjoy spending time with the “masses” or the “proletariat”. They were a means to an end: Political, social and economic power for he and his kind. Much like the modern “Progressives” and “Liberals” of today.


67 posted on 11/22/2007 9:01:38 AM PST by Thumper1960 (Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson