Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIFE FOR YOUNG DAD'S TEEN KILLERS
Daily Express ^

Posted on 11/23/2007 7:06:31 AM PST by UKrepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: thundrey
you cannot carry anything about you in public that is for the express purpose of being used as a weapon>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Not entirely true. In Scotland one is allowed to wear a dirk and a Sgian Dhu as exempt from the prohibition on public knife carrying, under the heading,"national dress."

I know, I was there as a gues and did it, got a few glances from bobbies, but they said nothing to me. I was kilted.

So there are are also ways to arm yourself still in Britain. If I lived there, I would have membership in several shooting clubs.

Brits would be better off if they organized such clubs in each and every borough throughout the country.

41 posted on 11/23/2007 8:09:33 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: thundrey
No, a life sentence is a life sentence. 17 years is when they are eligable for release on parole. Once they are released, they are effectively on parole for the rest of their lives, and if they break the terms of their release, they’re back inside to continue serving their life sentence...

Gotcha.... The killer is released after 17 years but is really still serving a life sentence. It's a "virtual" life sentence. And he goes from "virtual" jail back to real jail after he kills somebody else. Rinse and repeat.

42 posted on 11/23/2007 8:14:32 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thundrey
The Laws governing the ownership of guns and the right to carry weapons in public reflects public opinion, which frowns upon American-style gun laws and people wandering around with offensive weapons upon their person. Elitism doesn’t come into it....

What is an "offensive weapon?"

43 posted on 11/23/2007 8:24:02 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (Don't taze me, bro!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thundrey
If you are attacked, you are allowed to use ‘reasonable force’ using anything you might ‘happen’ to have on you.

Wow, that sucks.

I'm allowed to "use" this:

except mine's .40 cal.

44 posted on 11/23/2007 8:32:31 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (Don't taze me, bro!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
Judge Hodson lifted an order which banned publication of the details of the two younger defendants.

Good for him!

45 posted on 11/23/2007 8:49:34 PM PST by skr (How majestic is Thy Name, O Lord, and how mighty are Thy Works!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson